CITY OF RIO VISTA
GENERAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT
5-YEAR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAMS
FY 2005-2010
This is the City of Rio Vista
2005 – 2010 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Maintenance Program for
Transportation, Facilities, Water, Wastewater, Fleet, Information Technology,
Police, Fire, Recreation, Redevelopment, Airport and Facilities. The CIP is a comprehensive five-year
plan of capital projects and annual maintenance projects. The program is a guide for identifying
current and future fiscal requirements and becomes the basis for determining
the annual capital budget. Each
year when the CIP is reviewed, the program and its projects are adjusted based
upon Council priorities, funding availability, and policies.
The CIP has been prepared in
coordination with the on-going maintenance needs of the City of Rio Vista, in
order to assure the most effective use of available funds. The CIP is a planning tool, which is
subject to modification at any time to meet the changing needs and priorities
of the community. Findings and
recommendations of the General Plan and special studies are incorporated in the
CIP. It is an annual routine to
review and update the CIP at mid-year and during the preparation of the annual
budget. The Transportation,
Airport, Parks, Utilities, and Planning commission formally review, modify, and
recommend the 5-year CIP for city Council approval annually.
In future years our intent will
be to develop structured maintenance plans with an estimate of all ongoing and
future maintenance costs associated with both capital projects and our routine
maintenance needs. This tool is
essential to the financial care and health of our city assets and will allow
our residents to track our progress through future years.
This document demonstrates the
continued leadership of our City Administration. It includes background, existing objectives, conditions,
justifications, fiscal implications, projections of costs, and the projected
completion of some of the identified projects. The City Staff continue to display their dedication and hard
work in the on-going process of implementing identified capital improvements
and meeting the maintenance needs of the City of Rio Vista. I offer my sincere appreciation and
thanks to each City Council member, community member, Sylvir Consulting, Inc.,
and staff members for their input and creativity in the shaping and development
of this document.
Sincerely,
Brad Baxter
City Manager
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CIP FINANCIAL SUMMARY CHART................................................................................... 1
ADMINISTRATIVE STUDIES CAPITAL FINANCIAL SUMMARY CHART 14
ADMINISTRATIVE STUDIES CAPITAL PROJECTS...................................................... 15
Airport Master Plan and
Layout Plan...................................................................................... 15
Bike Trail Master Plan.............................................................................................................. 16
City Wide
Emergency/Disaster Plan......................................................................................... 18
Municipal Facilities
Master Plan............................................................................................... 19
Obstruction Survey................................................................................................................... 21
Park Master Plan...................................................................................................................... 22
Strategic/Management
Plans (Police)....................................................................................... 25
Storm Drainage Master
Plan.................................................................................................... 27
Transportation Master
Plan...................................................................................................... 28
Urban Water Master Plan......................................................................................................... 30
Sewer Master Plan..................................................................................................................... 31
Surface Water Treatment
and Storage Study.......................................................................... 33
AIRPORT FACILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FINANCIAL SUMMARY CHART 35
AIRPORT FACILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS...................................... 37
Aircraft Parking Apron
Drainage Upgrade............................................................................ 37
Airfield Perimeter Road............................................................................................................ 39
Airport Beacon.......................................................................................................................... 41
Apron Lighting.......................................................................................................................... 43
Automated Weather
Observing System (AWOS)..................................................................... 45
Hangars (New).......................................................................................................................... 47
Jet A Fuel System...................................................................................................................... 49
Permanent Fencing.................................................................................................................... 52
Security Key Pad
Car/Pedestrian Gates and Terminal Entry Door......................................... 54
Sewer System Upgrade -
Airport.............................................................................................. 56
Signage Upgrade
(Airport)....................................................................................................... 58
Taxiways and Ramp Area
Overlays and Rehabilitation.......................................................... 59
Terminal Improvements............................................................................................................ 61
Video Surveillance
Security System.......................................................................................... 64
|
PROJECT TITLE
|
FUNDING SECURED
|
FUNDING SOURCE
|
PRIORITY
|
2005/06 FY
|
2006/07
FY
|
2007/08 FY
|
2008/09 FY
|
2009/10 FY
|
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
ADMINISTRATIVE
STUDIES CAPITAL PROJECTS
|
|
Airport Master Plan and Layout Plan
|
X
|
|
AIP Grant
|
1
|
$60,000
|
$60,000
|
$47,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
Bike Trail Master Plan
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
3
|
---
|
---
|
$75,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
City Wide Emergency/Disaster Plan
|
X
|
|
General Funds
|
1
|
$5,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Municipal Facilities Master Plan
|
X
|
|
Fund 54
|
1
|
$5,000
|
$100,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Obstruction Survey
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
2
|
---
|
$70,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Park Master Plan
|
X
|
|
Developer Fees
|
1
|
$208,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Strategic/Management Plans (Police)
|
|
X
|
Developer Fees
|
2
|
$5,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Storm Drainage Master Plan
|
X
|
|
Developer Fees
|
1
|
$150,000
|
$50,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Transportation Master Plan
|
X
|
|
Developer Fees
|
1
|
$250,000
|
$250,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Urban Water Master Plan
|
X
|
|
Developer Fees
|
1
|
$200,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Sewer Master Plan
|
X
|
|
Developer Fees
|
1
|
$75,000
|
$50,000
|
$50,000
|
$50,000
|
$42,500
|
|
Surface Water Treatment and Storage Study
|
X
|
|
Developer Fees
|
1
|
$3,500
|
$30,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
AIRPORT FACILITY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
|
|
Airfield Perimeter Road
|
|
X
|
Airport Improvement
Fund/FAA Grant
|
3
|
---
|
$60,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Aircraft Parking Apron Drainage Upgrade
|
|
X
|
Airport Improvement
Funds
|
1
|
$54,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Airport Beacon
|
|
X
|
Non-Primary AIP
|
4
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
$35,000
|
---
|
|
Apron Lighting
|
|
X
|
Airport Improvement
Fund/FAA Grant
|
2
|
$2,500
|
$25,000
|
$25,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
Automated Weather Observing System (AWOS)
|
X
|
|
FAA GRANT
|
1
|
$80,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Hangars (New)
|
|
X
|
Airport Improvement
entitlement Funds
|
2
|
---
|
$500,000
|
$500,000
|
$500,000
|
$500,000
|
|
Jet A Fuel System
|
|
X
|
Cal Trans Aero
Division/Chevron
|
2
|
---
|
$150,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Permanent Fencing
|
X
|
|
FAA Non-Primary AIP
|
1
|
$19,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Security Key Pad Car/Pedestrian Gates and Terminal Entry
Door
|
X
|
|
Non-Primary AIP
|
1
|
$19,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Sewer System Upgrade - Airport
|
|
X
|
USDA or Non-Primary
AIP funds
|
2
|
---
|
$160,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Signage Upgrade (Airport)
|
|
X
|
AIP Funds
|
4
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
$50,000
|
---
|
|
Taxiways and Ramp Area Overlays and Rehabilitation
|
|
X
|
|
2
|
---
|
$37,500
|
$37,500
|
$37,500
|
$37,500
|
|
Terminal Improvements
|
|
X
|
AIP Funds
|
1
|
$17,500
|
$17,500
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Video Surveillance Security System
|
|
X
|
Airport Improvement
Funds
|
1
|
$7,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
FIRE DEPARTMENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
|
|
City Emergency Operations Center Upgrade/Disaster Plan
|
|
X
|
General Funds/Grant
Funds
|
1
|
$70,000
|
$30,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
EMS Equipment
|
|
X
|
General Fund/Grant
Funds
|
3
|
$50,000
|
$50,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Hose Replacement / Upgrade
|
|
X
|
General Funds/Grant
Fund
|
1
|
$30,000
|
$30,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Fire Department ADA Improvements
|
X
|
|
CDBG Grant/General
Fund
|
1
|
$15,000
|
$84,240
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Fire Station Living Quarters Remodel
|
|
X
|
General Funds/Grant
Fund
|
1
|
$150,000
|
$100,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Mobile Burn Trailer
|
|
X
|
General Funds/Grant
Funds
|
5
|
---
|
---
|
$150,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
Personal Protective Equipment /ÒTurnoutsÓ
|
|
X
|
General Funds/Grant
Funds
|
1
|
$33,000
|
$33,000
|
$78,000
|
$23,000
|
$23,000
|
|
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Storage Lockers
|
|
X
|
General Funds/Grant
Funds
|
1
|
$7,500
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Rio Vista Fire Station #2
|
|
X
|
Developer Fees
|
1
|
$75,000
|
$2,500,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Self Contained Breathing Apparatus
|
|
X
|
General Funds/Grant
Funds
|
1
|
$10,000
|
$10,000
|
$20,000
|
$10,000
|
$10,000
|
|
Station Alerting System
|
|
X
|
General Funds/Grant
Funds
|
1
|
$7,500
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Vehicle Exhaust Removal System
|
|
X
|
General Funds/Grant
Funds
|
1
|
$45,000
|
$45,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
FLEET CAPITAL
PROJECTS
|
|
Five ½ - 1 Ton Trucks – Public Works
|
|
X
|
General Fund
|
|
$75,000
|
$75,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Backhoe Equipment
|
|
X
|
General Fund
|
2
|
$250,000
|
$25,000
|
$25,000
|
$25,000
|
$25,000
|
|
Bucket Truck
|
|
X
|
General Fund
|
2
|
---
|
$60,000
|
$10,000
|
$10,000
|
$10,000
|
|
Brush Attack Unit Replacement - Fire
|
|
X
|
General Fund/Grant
Funds
|
2
|
---
|
$250,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Fire Prevention Inspector Sedan
|
|
X
|
GF/Contributions
|
1
|
$35,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Mowers (for parks)
|
|
X
|
General Fund
|
2
|
---
|
$60,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Police Vehicles (Fleet Rental Contract)
|
|
X
|
General Fund
|
1
|
$80,000
|
$80,000
|
$80,000
|
$80,000
|
$80,000
|
|
ÒQuintÓ Ladder Truck - Fire
|
|
X
|
General Fund/Grant
Funds
|
1
|
$150,000
|
$150,000
|
$150,000
|
$150,000
|
$150,000
|
|
Street Sweeper
|
|
X
|
General Fund
|
1
|
$200,00
|
$200,00
|
$20,000
|
$20,000
|
$20,000
|
|
Type One Fire Engine
|
|
X
|
General Fund/Grant
Funds
|
3
|
---
|
---
|
$450,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
Utility Pick-up Truck Fire Department
|
|
X
|
General Fund
|
2
|
$20,000
|
$15,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Vacuum Truck
|
|
X
|
General Fund
|
|
$200,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Wood Chipper – Commercial Grade
|
|
X
|
General Fund
|
3
|
---
|
$12,150
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
|
|
Cell Phones, Radios, Pagers
|
|
X
|
General Fund
|
1
|
$33,000
|
$17,650
|
$9,450
|
$8,650
|
$14,150
|
|
Eden Software -
Additional User Licenses
|
|
X
|
General Fund
|
2
|
$2,000
|
$10,000
|
$4,000
|
$2,000
|
$2,000
|
|
Eden Software- Parcel and Permits Module
|
X
|
|
General Fund
– Prepaid Debt Financing
|
1
|
$44,350
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Eden Software - Utility Billing
|
X
|
|
General Fund
– Prepaid Debt Financing
|
1
|
$34,475
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Fiber Optic Institutional Network (I-Net)
|
|
X
|
General
Fund/Water-Wastewater Funds – Partially Secured Funding from Developer
Contributions for NWWTP
|
1
|
494,007.65
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Fire Radios
|
X
|
|
General Fund/Grant
Funds
|
1
|
$10,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
GIS Software – Fire, Police, and Public Works
Departments
|
|
X
|
General Fund/Grant
Funds
|
1
|
$5,000
|
$7,500
|
$2,500
|
$2,500
|
$2,500
|
|
Human Resources - Eden Software
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
5
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
$34,775
|
|
Pavement Management System Software
|
X
|
|
PTAP Grant
|
1
|
$5,000
|
$5,000
|
$5,000
|
$5,000
|
$5,000
|
|
Vehicle Laptop Computers – Fire Department
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
2
|
$25,000
|
$25,000
|
$25,000
|
$25,000
|
---
|
|
Phone System
|
X
|
|
General Funds
|
1
|
$30,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Replace and Upgrade City Computers
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
1
|
$20,000
|
$20,000
|
$20,000
|
$20,000
|
$20,000
|
|
Satellite Phones
|
|
X
|
General Funds/Grant
Funds
|
1
|
$6,000
|
$3,000
|
$3,000
|
$3,000
|
$3,000
|
|
Software Upgrades
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
1
|
$10,000
|
$10,000
|
$10,000
|
$10,000
|
$10,000
|
|
Surf Control
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
1
|
$12,074
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Time Tracker Software
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
1
|
$5,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Video Recording Project
|
X
|
|
General
Funds/Comcast Grant
|
1
|
30,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Website
|
X
|
|
General Funds
|
1
|
$10,000
|
$5,000
|
$5,000
|
$5,000
|
$10,000
|
|
MUNICIPAL
FACILITY CAPITAL PROJECTS
|
|
Automated Electronic Defibrillators (AED)
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
1
|
$14,000
|
$20,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Army Base Redevelopment
|
|
X
|
Dept. of Water
Resources/ Developers/General Funds
|
4
|
$500,000
|
$1,500,000
|
$1,700,000
|
$1,250,000
|
---
|
|
City Hall ADA Improvements
|
X
|
|
CDBG Grant/General
Funds
|
1
|
$60,000
|
$120,500
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Civic Center/Community Center/City Hall Expansion
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
3
|
$50,000
|
$350,000
|
$1,500,000
|
$300,000
|
$2,800,000
|
|
Security Card Access
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
1
|
$70,000
|
$30,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
PARK DEVELOPMENT
CAPITAL PROJECTS
|
|
Downtown Waterfront ÒRiver Walk TrailÓ
|
|
X
|
RDA debt and
additions bonding
|
3
|
$150,000
|
$150,000
|
$1,300,000
|
$800,000
|
---
|
|
Municipal Swimming Pool
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
3
|
---
|
$50,000
|
$200,000
|
$2,250,000
|
---
|
|
Shea Park (Airport Rd)
|
X
|
|
Shea Homes
|
1
|
$300,000
|
$1,000,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Skate Park
|
|
X
|
Developer Fees
|
4
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
$100,000
|
---
|
|
PARK FACILITIES
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
|
|
Boat Launch Restroom Reconstruction
|
X
|
|
Solano County
Grant/General Funds
|
2
|
---
|
$15,000
|
$75,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
City Fishing Access Upgrade
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
2
|
$20,000
|
---
|
$80,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
City Fishing Pier restroom Reconstruction
|
X
|
|
Solano County
Grant/General Funds
|
2
|
---
|
$15,000
|
$75,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
Crescent Park Rejuvenation
|
|
X
|
General Funds/Grant
Funds
|
1
|
$167,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Egbert Field Ball Park Grand Stand Renovation
|
|
X
|
General Funds/Grant
Funds
|
2
|
$75,000
|
$25,000
|
$50,000
|
$25,000
|
$25,000
|
|
FIBAR Playground Cover
|
|
X
|
General Funds/Grant
Funds
|
3
|
---
|
$20,000
|
---
|
---
|
$4,500
|
|
Homecoming Park Basketball Court
|
|
X
|
General Funds/Grant
Funds
|
2
|
---
|
$20,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Outdoor Movie Screen
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
3
|
$150,000
|
$25,000
|
$50,000
|
$75,000
|
$25,000
|
|
Park Improvement & Sprinkler Rehabilitation
|
X
|
|
Prop. 40 Per Capita
|
1
|
$15,000
|
$50,000
|
$100,000
|
$10,000
|
$10,000
|
|
Portable Stage
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
2
|
$180,000
|
$30,000
|
$30,000
|
$30,000
|
$50,000
|
|
Val de Flores Neighborhood Park Tot Lot
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
1
|
---
|
$8,000
|
$50,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
Youth Center Refurbishment
|
|
X
|
General
Funds/Developer Fees
|
2
|
$70,000
|
$40,000
|
$40,000
|
$40,000
|
$60,000
|
|
POLICE
DEPARTMENT CAPITAL PROJECTS
|
|
Police Canine Program
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
1
|
$27,181
|
$21,022
|
$15,011
|
$37,872
|
$25,522
|
|
Police Emergency Communications Contract
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
1
|
$30,000
|
$60,000
|
$65,000
|
$70,000
|
$75,000
|
|
Emergency Communication Equipment - Police Vehicles
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
1
|
$33,000
|
$22,000
|
---
|
$22,000
|
$33,000
|
|
Necessary Shoulder Fired Weapons
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
1
|
$13,800
|
$6,900
|
---
|
$6,900
|
$13,800
|
|
New Police Station
|
|
X
|
Developer Fees
|
2
|
$150,000
|
$850,000
|
$1,000,000
|
$500,000
|
$500,000
|
|
Officer Safety Equipment (Soft Ballistic Body Armor)
|
X
|
|
General Funds/Grant
Funds
|
1
|
$6,040
|
$3,020
|
$3,020
|
$4,530
|
$4,530
|
|
Officer Safety Equipment (Firearms)
|
X
|
|
General Funds
|
1
|
$15,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Officer Uniform Safety Equipment (Required Uniform Safety Equipment)
|
|
X
|
General Funds/Grant
Funds
|
1
|
$9,434
|
$1,178
|
$1,178
|
$1,178
|
$1,178
|
|
Police Records Management System (Evidence Bar Coding)
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
1
|
$2,400
|
$100
|
$100
|
$100
|
$2,300
|
|
Police Vehicle In-Car Mobile Video and Audio Equipment
|
|
X
|
General Funds/Grant
Funds
|
1
|
$39,700
|
$3,600
|
$3,600
|
$3,600
|
$3,600
|
|
Replacement of Heating/Air Conditioning System
|
|
X
|
General
Funds/Developer Fees
|
1
|
$30,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Police Facility (New Roof)
|
X
|
|
General Funds/CDBG
Grant Funds
|
1
|
$92,710
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Reserve Police Officer Program
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
1
|
$5,000
|
$10,000
|
$10,000
|
$10,000
|
$10,000
|
|
Surveillance Equipment
|
|
X
|
General Funds/Grant
Funds
|
1
|
$10,749
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Traffic Safety Program
|
X
|
|
OTS Grant/General
Funds
|
1
|
$142,000
|
$4,000
|
$4,000
|
$4,000
|
$4,000
|
|
PUBLIC WORKS
FACILITY CAPITAL PROJECTS
|
|
Emergency Back-up Power (All City Facilities)
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
1
|
$100,000
|
$100,000
|
$100,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
Public Works Facility & Corporation Yard
|
X
|
|
Developer Fees
|
1
|
$1,250,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
TRANSPORTATION
CAPITAL PROJECTS
|
|
ADA Ramps and Parking Spaces
|
X
|
|
CDBG
Grant/Transportation Funds
|
1
|
$431,390
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Airport Road Improvement
|
X
|
|
Developer Fees
|
1
|
$2,000,000
|
$3,000,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Alley and Parking Improvements (Downtown)
|
|
X
|
Transportation
Funds
|
3
|
$100,000
|
$375,000
|
---
|
$125,000
|
$250,000
|
|
Bike Enhancements/Routes
|
|
X
|
Transportation
Funds
|
3
|
$25,000
|
$25,000
|
$25,000
|
$25,000
|
$25,000
|
|
Center Street Improvements
|
X
|
|
Transportation
Funds
|
3
|
---
|
$200,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Church Road Improvements
|
X
|
|
Developer Fees
|
1
|
$900,000
|
$900,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
City Dock/Boat Launch Replacement
|
|
X
|
Transportation
Funds/Boat and Waterways Grant
|
2
|
$50,000
|
$250,000
|
$500,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk Replacement
|
|
X
|
Transportation
Funds/Developer Fees
|
1
|
$40,000
|
$40,000
|
$40,000
|
$40,000
|
$40,000
|
|
Highway 12 Bridge Replacement and Widening
|
|
X
|
Transportation
Funds/ CalTrans Grant
|
1
|
---
|
$250,000
|
$250,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
Liberty Island Road Improvements
|
X
|
|
Developer Fees
|
1
|
$1,000,000
|
$1,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
Opticom Traffic Signal Pre-empt System
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
3
|
---
|
---
|
$75,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
Road Overlays
|
|
X
|
Transportation
Funds
|
1
|
$300,000
|
$300,000
|
$300,000
|
$300,000
|
$250,000
|
|
Streetscape Improvements (Various Locations)
|
|
X
|
Redevelopment
Funds/CDBG Grant
|
1
|
$50,000
|
$250,000
|
$1,000,000
|
$750,000
|
$750,000
|
|
Street Signs
|
X
|
|
Federal Appropriation
|
1
|
$50,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Street Striping
|
X
|
|
Transportation
Funds
|
1
|
$30,000
|
$15,000
|
$15,000
|
$15,000
|
$15,000
|
|
Transit Buses
|
X
|
|
TDA Funds
|
1
|
---
|
$60,000
|
---
|
$60,000
|
---
|
|
Way Finding Signs
|
X
|
|
Transportation
|
1
|
---
|
$25,000
|
$25,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
WASTEWATER
FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS
|
|
Beach Drive Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrades
|
|
X
|
Wastewater
Funds/Developer Fees
|
1
|
$65,500
|
$406,170
|
$83,050
|
$133,050
|
---
|
|
Northwest Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion
|
X
|
|
Developer Fees
|
1
|
$30 M +
|
---
|
$1,000,000
|
$12 M + (unsecured)
|
---
|
|
Trilogy Plant Retirement
|
X
|
|
Wastewater
Funds/Developer Purchase
|
1
|
$3,000,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Airport Road Lift Station
|
|
X
|
Wastewater
Funds/Developer Fees
|
1
|
$15,150
|
$2,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Marina Lift Station
|
|
X
|
Wastewater
Funds/Developer Fees
|
1
|
$23,590
|
$111,950
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
River Road Lift Station
|
X
|
|
Wastewater
Funds/Developer Fees
|
2
|
---
|
$14,250
|
$9,500
|
---
|
---
|
|
Second Street Lift Station
|
X
|
|
Wastewater
Funds/Developer Fees
|
2
|
---
|
$13,000
|
$8,000
|
---
|
$4,500
|
|
Collection Lines
|
|
X
|
Wastewater
Funds/Developer Fees/General Funds
|
1
|
---
|
$750,000
|
$750,000
|
$250,000
|
$250,000
|
|
WATER FACILITIES
CAPITAL
|
|
Water Hydrant Replacement
|
|
X
|
Water Improvement
Funds
|
1
|
$21,600
|
$21,600
|
$21,600
|
$21,600
|
$21,600
|
|
Water Meters
|
|
X
|
Water Improvement
Funds/Grant Funds
|
1
|
$300,000
|
$300,000
|
$100,000
|
$100,000
|
$200,000
|
|
Water Tanks
|
X
|
|
Developer Fees
|
1
|
$300,000
|
$500,000
|
$1,600,000
|
$1,600,000
|
$1,600,000
|
|
Funding Secured
Yes/No
|
2005/06 FY
Total
|
2006/07
FY
Total
|
2007/08 FY
Total
|
2008/09 FY
Total
|
2009/10 FY
Total
|
|
|
YES
|
$40,828,714
|
$8,100,010
|
$3,052,520
|
$1,724,530
|
$1,720,500
|
|
|
NO
|
$4,910,936.65
|
$11,032,820
|
$11,003,989
|
$20,267,950
|
$6,369,925
|
|
|
GRAND TOTALS
|
$45,739,650.65
|
$19,132,830
|
$14,056,509
|
$21,992,480
|
$8,090,425
|
$109,011,894.65
|
|
|
PROJECT TITLE
|
FUNDING SECURED
|
FUNDING SOURCE
|
PRIORITY
|
2005/06 FY
|
2006/07
FY
|
2007/08 FY
|
2008/09 FY
|
2009/10 FY
|
|
Airport Master Plan and Layout Plan
|
Yes
|
No
|
AIP Grant
|
1
|
$60,000
|
$60,000
|
$47,000
|
---
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Bike Trail Master Plan
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
3
|
---
|
---
|
$75,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
City Wide Emergency/Disaster Plan
|
X
|
|
General Funds
|
1
|
$5,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Municipal Facilities Master Plan
|
X
|
|
Fund 54
|
1
|
$5,000
|
$100,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Obstruction Survey
|
|
X
|
General Funds
|
2
|
---
|
$70,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Park Master Plan
|
X
|
|
Developer Fees
|
1
|
$208,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Strategic/Management Plans (Police)
|
|
X
|
Developer Fees
|
2
|
$5,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Storm Drainage Master Plan
|
X
|
|
Developer Fees
|
1
|
$150,000
|
$50,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Transportation Master Plan
|
X
|
|
Developer Fees
|
1
|
$250,000
|
$250,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Urban Water Master Plan
|
X
|
|
Developer Fees
|
1
|
$200,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Sewer Master Plan
|
X
|
|
Developer Fees
|
1
|
$75,000
|
$50,000
|
$50,000
|
$50,000
|
---
|
|
Surface Water Treatment and Storage Study
|
X
|
|
Developer Fees
|
1
|
$3,500
|
$30,000
|
---
|
---
|
$42,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location: 3000 Baumann Road
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
The City needs an airport master
plan to insure that the growth of the airport and the development of the
surrounding lands comply with the CityÕs general plan and airport land use
master plan.
Project Objectives
The objective is to control
and regulate growth at and in and around the airport.
Existing Condition
The Phase I Report of the
Airport Master Plan was completed in February 2004. Phase II Report of the Airport Master Plan was completed in
July 2005. Modifications to the airport master plan and the Airport Layout Plan
are currently being developed.
Fiscal Implications
A contract has been awarded to
Aries Consultants, Ltd. in 2003.
Total contract to date amount expensed is approximately $54,400. Previous AIP grant money has funded the
total contract amount of $167,000.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
03/04
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
$54,400
|
$167,000
|
$60,000
|
$60,000
|
$47,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$167,000
|
$60,000
|
$60,000
|
$47,000
|
---
|
---
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
Phase I
|
Phase II
Final
|
Construct
|
Construct
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
A master plan is needed to
determine the type and extent of aviation needed at the airport through the
year 2025.
Comments
Almost every single capital improvement flows from and/or
is justified by a well executed Airport Master Plan and Airport Layout
Plan.
Location: Citywide
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background:
The City currently has no bike
trail master plan. Residents and
visitors do not have a safe means of recreation and/or transportation using a
bicycle around the City.
Project Objectives:
To provide a blueprint for
developing a bikeway system that includes both on-street and off-street
facilities throughout the City; a plan that takes into consideration the
quality of life for residents and visitors, includes bikeway facilities,
enhances safety and convenience of bicycling to and from work and/or school,
and educates residents and visitors on the safety of bicycling.
Existing Condition:
The only bike lane in the City
is on Poppy House Road. There
currently are no designated bike trails.
Fiscal Implications:
Funding for the development of
the Bike Master Plan has not been allocated. Funds will likely come from the City General Fund.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
$75,000
|
---
|
---
|
$75,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$75,000
|
---
|
---
|
$75,000
|
---
|
---
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification:
Currently, the City has no
bike trails and safe bike lanes.
Residents and visitors do not have a safe means of recreation and/or
transportation using a bicycle around the City.
During the 2004 Citizen
Survey, there was an expressed need for recreation for all ages. The community specifically mentioned a
bike trail as an area of recreational interest.
Comments
Development of this master
plan will make the City eligible to apply for grant funds to construct the bike
trails identified in the plan.
Location: City Wide
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
The CityÕs current City-wide
Emergency/Disaster Plan was developed prior to the 911 terrorist attack. The City and the Nation have undergone
great deal of changes since this time; therefore the City needs to update this
Plan.
Project Objectives
Provide an up to date
City-wide Emergency/Disaster Plan that addresses what should be done by whom
and where people should go should an emergency or disaster occur.
Existing Condition
The CityÕs current plan does
not address all of the issues recommended by State and Federal agencies to
provide adequate direction during an emergency or disaster.
Fiscal Implications
The cost to update the
emergency preparedness plan will be funded jointly by the Police and Fire Departments.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
$5,000
|
|
$5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
$5,000
|
|
$5,000
|
|
|
|
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
Plan Update
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
All of the terrorist and
natural disasters have made it painfully aware how important it is to have up
to date disaster preparedness plan in order to minimize loss of life, property
damage, and to maximize resources.
Updating the CityÕs Disaster and Emergency Preparedness Plan should be a
high priority.
Comments
None.
Location: Various locations at
existing and future facility sites.
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
Master plans have been
programmed for parks, water, transportation and wastewater. The Municipal
Facilities Fund (Fund 54) is funded by developer impact fees collected for the
purpose of providing expanded public facilities to accommodate growth. The
facilities intended to be funded by this source are typically buildings and
large, long life equipment such as fire engines. A master plan for the
expansion of City buildings and facilities funded by the Municipal Facilities
Fee also needs to be undertaken and completed.
Project Objectives
Complete a master plan and
financing program for city facilities such as City Hall, Police Station, Fire
Station, fire engines, Community/Recreation Center, Senior Center, Library,
Swimming Pool and/or other community facilities.
Existing Condition
Some facilities exist, but
must be replaced or expanded; others do not yet exist (second fire station,
community center, etc.)
Fiscal Implications
The funds for this project are
secured and the source is the Municipal Facilities Fund (Fund 54).
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
$105,000
|
$5,000
|
$100,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
TOTAL
|
$100,000
|
$105,000
|
$5,000
|
$100,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
RFP
Process
|
Complete
Plan
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
There is no coordinated plan
for expansion/new facilities construction. All other capital facilities have
been included in the master planning process. Master plan will propose project phasing, construction
schedules and financing programs.
Comments
None
Location: 3000 Baumann Road
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project
Rio Vista Airport needs a
complete Obstacle Survey. The
survey is the foundation the FAA needs to approve the development of a GPS
Localizer Performance with Vertical guidance (LPV) approach. The current GPS approach to runway 25
has an angling final which results in higher minimums and was not designed with
WAAS (Wide Area Augmentation System). The difference being the increased
accuracy available with a GPS WAAS receiver and thus enhancing the safety of
operations especially in low visibility operations. Additionally, the FAA has stated it will begin
decommissioning VORs and NDBs nationwide and begin to replace them with
GPS. Rio VistaÕs only other
approach is a VOR off of Sacramento, and therefore, with its potential loss a
sense of urgency to acquire a new safer GPS approach not only to RW 25, but to
the other runways as well.
Project Objectives
Complete an Airport Obstacle
Survey which must be completed before the FAA commences approved approach
development. Rio Vista is already
in line at the Washington office for a new GPS LPV approach as soon as our
survey is completed.
Existing Condition
The VOR approach from
Sacramento will be eventually decommissioned leaving the angling final, higher
minimums, GPS approach we have now.
Fiscal Implications
The cost of the survey is
approximately $70,000 to complete and it becomes a part of the Airports Master
Plan. At this point no funds exist
to complete this project; however, the FAA occasionally has fallout funds which
are reallocated to airports with viable plans or projects.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
$70,000
|
---
|
$70,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$70,000
|
---
|
$70,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Survey
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
The survey then becomes the
foundation by which the FAA can build a new GPS approach(s). A GPS LPV approach will allow
aircraft to fly to a lower altitude during the approach. This is the criteria by which most
airports are judged to determine if a business will be willing to relocate
their operation to the Rio Vista Airport.
The Obstruction Survey is
required to be completed before the FAA can even begin to design GPS LPV
approaches. The FAA plans to
decommission VORs and NDBs across the country and plan to build 300 GPS LPV
approaches a year. It is
absolutely vital that Rio Vista obtains the lowest minimums possible to attract
business aircraft to the airfield long term.
Comments
None
Location: Citywide
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background:
Currently, there is no master plan
for parks and recreation facilities.
Project Objectives
Develop a parks and recreation
master plan that will provide policies, guidelines, and a vision for existing
and future park and recreation amenities, and serve as a guide in determining
future facility and programming activities. The master plan will provide a comprehensive view of the
CityÕs park and recreation resources and develop a practical program for
financing the acquisition, development and operation of an effective park and
recreation system for the period 2005 through 2020.
Existing Condition
The City currently does not
have a defined plan to address the recreational need of its citizens.
Fiscal Implications
A contract was awarded in
December 2004. The plan will be
funded by using developer fees.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
$208,000
|
$208,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$208,000
|
$208,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
Contract
Awarded
|
Complete
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
It is the responsibility of
the City to provide safe recreation for the community. The master plan will provide the City a
planning tool for developing and maintaining existing and new parks, and
identify potential locations for future park sites.
Comments
None
Strategic/Management
Plans (Fire)
Location: Fire Department
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
The Fire Department is
currently staffed with 4 permanent firefighters, 15 part-time firefighters and
20 volunteers. The CityÕs
population is increasing rapidly and is expected to reach a population of
approximately 25,000. The Fire
Department is not currently staffed adequately and as the population grows and
new developments are built, the need to have adequate staffing levels becomes a
critical need to meet the safety needs of the public.
Project Objectives
Develop a strategic management
plan that analyzes the future staffing needs of the department and recommend a
phased hiring plan.
Existing Condition
There is no current Strategic
Plan for the Fire Department
Fiscal Implications
Fire Department staff salaries
are paid with tax revenues. As the
City is developed the tax revenues will increase and are expected to fund the
new positions. Funding has not
been secured for the strategic plan.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
In 1/1/05 10,000
|
$10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
$10,000
|
|
$10,000
|
|
|
|
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
Phase
|
10,000
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
In order to ensure adequate
public safety services, the fire department must plan increase its staff levels
as the population increases.
Comments
To hire a consultant to work
with the fire department and city staff for the Strategic Plan for RVFD.
Location: Police Department
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
The Police Department is
currently staffed with 11 sworn personnel, 3 non-sworn personnel, and 1
volunteer. The CityÕs population
is increasing rapidly and is expected to reach a population of approximately
25,000.
Project Objectives
Develop a strategic management
plan that analyzes the future staffing needs of the department and recommend a
phased hiring plan.
Existing Condition
The Police Department is not
currently staffed adequately and as the population grows and new developments
are built, the need to have adequate staffing levels becomes a critical need to
meet the safety needs of the public.
Fiscal Implications
Police Department staff
salaries are paid with tax revenues.
As the City is developed the tax revenues will increase and are expected
to fund the new positions.
The management plan will be
paid for with general fund monies.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
$5,000
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
$5,000
|
|
|
$5,000
|
|
|
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
A strategic management plan
for staffing has never been developed, and probably wasnÕt needed for several
years, but now that the city is growing rapidly such a plan will be an
important tool for the police department and the city.
Comments
None
Location: Citywide
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
Currently, the City does not
have a master plan.
Project Objectives
The objective is to develop an
accurate record of existing and proposed storm drain facilities as well develop
a method of maintaining and upgrading the existing system. The master plan will provide data
regarding the location and condition of the system, and provide recommendations
and a phased plan for renovating the system. A camera will be used to survey the drainage network.
Existing Condition
The City does not have an
accurate record of our system. The
current drainage system does not effectively collect and remove storm water
from the surface and in several locations the City has installed water pumps
and hose distribution systems on private property to prevent flooding.
Fiscal Implications
The Storm Water Master Plan
will be developed using developer fee funds.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
$200,000
|
$150,000
|
50,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$200,000
|
$100,000
|
50,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
RFP Process
|
Complete
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
The current storm water
drainage system is seriously inadequate and a plan needs to be developed to
identify the deficiencies in the system and provide recommendations to upgrade
the system so it operates properly.
Comments
This plan is a very important
tool for upgrading and repairing the system, establishing a maintenance plan,
and for setting standards for new developments.
Location: Citywide
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
Currently, there is no
transportation master plan to address the growing transportation needs of the
City and outlying areas. The County
of Solano is currently developing a Comprehensive Transportation Master Plan
for the county and the City needs to develop a plan that fits within that plan,
but also address the specific needs of the City.
Project Objectives
The objective is to develop a
plan that incorporates transportation needs of the local community and
addresses the outlying areas. The
Plan will incorporate standards specified in the County of Solano.
Existing Condition
The City does not have a
planned transportation network.
Fiscal Implications
The cost to develop the Transportation Master Plan will
be funded with developer fee funds.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
$500,000
|
$250,000
|
$250,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$500,000
|
$250,000
|
$250,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
RFP Process
|
Complete
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
It is important that the City
develop and regularly update a Transportation Master Plan to develop standards
for new developments. The
Transportation Master Plan (TMP) provides the policy basis for how
transportation funding is spent, and what projects or programs the city focuses
on to provide transportation services for its citizens.
Comments
None
Location: Citywide
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
The City of Rio Vista
currently has a Master Plan for the Water Supply and Delivery System that was
adopted by City Council on 10/2/03, and performed a Groundwater Evaluation in
the summer of 2002. The last Master Utility Plan was completed in 1985 when the
population was approximately 3,000 people.
Project Objectives
Have an Urban Water Master
Plan that addresses the current availability of water sources; includes an
assessment of the current distribution system; provides recommendations for upgrading
the system to be more efficient and identifies repairs needed and establishes
an implementation schedule; recommendations for expansion and connectivity to
the existing system; identifies alternative water sources including water
recycling, groundwater recharge, and reservoirs; identifies water conservation
measures and objectives, and the associated benefits; and also provides
potential funding sources for implementing the objectives of the plan. The
urban water master plan will be developed in accordance with the Water Code
that will provide policies, guidelines, and a vision for existing and future
water management, serving as a guide in determining future infrastructure
development and/or expansion, operations, and maintenance. The master plan will
provide a comprehensive view of the CityÕs water resources and develop a
practical program for financing the acquisition, development and operation of
an effective urban water system for the period 2006 through 2026.
Existing Condition
The City has never developed
an Urban Water Master Plan. As the
CityÕs population increases, the City is required by law to develop an Urban
Water Master Plan.
Fiscal Implications
A Request for Proposal was
released soliciting proposals from qualified firms to create the Urban Water
Master Plan and a contract was awarded in December 2004 to TetraTech, Inc. The
cost to prepare this master plan is securely funded with developer fees.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
|
$200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
$200,000
|
|
$200,000
|
|
|
|
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
Professional
Service Contract Awarded
|
Complete
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
As the CityÕs population
increases, the City is required by law to develop an Urban Water Master
Plan. This plan is also important
because it establishes a planning tool for the City for new development and identifies
and programs system upgrades.
Comments
None
Location: City-wide
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
The City currently operates
two wastewater treatment plants, the Beach Drive Plant and the Trilogy
Plant. With the opening in the
Spring of 2006 of the Northwest Wastewater Treatment Plant, the Trilogy Plant
will be decommissioned. The Beach
Drive Plant is nearing its design capacity and is in need of upgrades to allow
it to continue to meet permit discharge requirements.
The Beach Drive Plant
collection systems made up of a series of gravity mains and lift stations and
accompanying pressure mains. The
lift stations are expense to operate and maintain.
Project Objectives
Develop a plan to re-route
gravity mains, eliminate lift stations and redirect sewer flows to the
Northwest Wastewater Treatment Plant.
This will eliminate the need to operate and maintain two wastewater
facilities and eliminate the need for a number of the lift stations.
Existing Condition
The City does not have
adequate records of its sewer collection system. It is also unclear as to the impact of connecting new
developments to the existing sewer collection system.
Fiscal Implications
The cost to complete this
assessment and develop a management plan is substantial, because such a plan
has never been developed. To help
defray the cost, the City could phase the plan to begin at the treatment
facility and follow the system away from the plant. The oldest sections of the City would be assessed first, and
the next three phases would be prioritized by age as well.
The first phase analyzing the
older section of Rio Vista is eligible to receive CDBG Planning and Technical
Assistance Funds, and then the subsequent construction could receive a
significant portion of it funding from the General Allocation Program.
Developer fees may also be a
source of funds for certain phases of this plan.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
$200,000
|
|
$7,500
|
50,000
|
50,000
|
50,000
|
42,500
|
|
TOTAL
|
$200,000
|
|
$7,500
|
50,000
|
50,000
|
50,000
|
42,500
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
Grant
Application/
RFP Process
|
Phase I
|
Phase II
|
Phase III
|
Phase IV
|
Project Justification
Not knowing anything about
such an important public works system as the sewer system results in increased
repair costs, reduces staff resources, and presents unknown potential hazards
to the community.
Comments
None.
Location: N/A
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
The City currently has water
rights to the Sacramento River during the winter months, but the City does not
have a facility to treat and store this water, so the City is not receiving any
of this water. The City only
receives water from groundwater wells.
Some of these wells are not functioning or contaminating, which limits
the amount of potable water available to the residents and businesses located
in Rio Vista.
Project Objectives
Extract, treat and store river
water for drinking water purposes.
Existing Condition
The City currently has a
sufficient supply of drinking water, however, the water levels in the
groundwater wells have dropped and some of the wells are not functioning or are
contaminated. These conditions are
a significant concern as the City continues to grow and more homes and
businesses are built in Rio Vista.
It is important that the City retain all water rights available to
ensure a sufficient water supply into the future.
Fiscal Implications
The potential sources of
funding are developer fee funds and/or water division funds.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
33,500
|
|
$3,500
|
$30,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
TOTAL
|
33,500
|
|
$3,500
|
$30,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
RFP
Process
|
Complete
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
Water is a vital commodity,
especially to a growing community.
The City needs to take advantage of the fact that surface water from the
Sacramento River is available or the City may loose it right to this water in
the future if water supplies continue to diminish around the State.
Comments
None
|
|
|
PROJECT TITLE
|
FUNDING SECURED
|
FUNDING SOURCE
|
PRIORITY
|
2005/06 FY
|
2006/07
FY
|
2007/08 FY
|
2008/09 FY
|
2009/10 FY
|
|
YES
|
NO
|
|
Airfield Perimeter Road
|
|
X
|
Airport Improvement
Fund/FAA Grant
|
3
|
---
|
$60,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Aircraft Parking Apron Drainage Upgrade
|
|
X
|
Airport Improvement
Funds
|
1
|
$54,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Airport Beacon
|
|
X
|
Non-Primary AIP
|
4
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
$35,000
|
---
|
|
Apron Lighting
|
|
X
|
Airport Improvement
Fund/FAA Grant
|
2
|
$2,500
|
$25,000
|
$25,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
Automated Weather Observing System (AWOS)
|
X
|
|
FAA GRANT
|
1
|
$80,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Hangars (New)
|
|
X
|
Airport Improvement
entitlement Funds
|
2
|
---
|
$500,000
|
$500,000
|
$500,000
|
$500,000
|
|
Jet A Fuel System
|
|
X
|
Cal Trans Aero
Division/Chevron
|
2
|
---
|
$150,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Permanent Fencing
|
X
|
|
FAA Non-Primary AIP
|
1
|
$19,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Security Key Pad Car/Pedestrian Gates and Terminal Entry
Door
|
X
|
|
Non-Primary AIP
|
1
|
$19,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Sewer System Upgrade - Airport
|
|
X
|
USDA or Non-Primary
AIP funds
|
2
|
---
|
$160,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Signage Upgrade (Airport)
|
|
X
|
AIP Funds
|
4
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
$50,000
|
---
|
|
Taxiways and Ramp Area Overlays and Rehabilitation
|
|
X
|
|
2
|
---
|
$37,500
|
$37,500
|
$37,500
|
$37,500
|
|
Terminal Improvements
|
|
X
|
AIP Funds
|
1
|
$17,500
|
$17,500
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Video Surveillance Security System
|
|
X
|
Airport Improvement
Funds
|
1
|
$7,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location: 3000 Baumann Road
Priority (Place an X to
indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
Most of the apron drains have
sunken (settled) to the extent that an aircraft taxiing through the drainage
area would experience a propeller strike with the surrounding asphalt. These areas are currently annotated
with a Non-Standard yellow X
drawing attention to the drain area but causing confusion with aviators.
Project Objectives
The objective is to upgrade
the existing drainage system to ensure that the aircraft parking apron drainage
system continues to provide adequate drainage but raise the drains themselves
and then re-slope the surrounding asphalt.
Existing Condition
The existing drainage system
does not allow aircraft to maintain taxiway centerline in all areas of the ramp
without taxi through a drainage area and risk damaging their propellers. This
is especially true of a twin engine aircraft where the nose wheel of the
aircraft was in the middle of the drain with the propellers on each side
striking the rising asphalt.
Fiscal Implications
The funding source will be
airport improvement funds.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/06
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
$54,000
|
$54,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$54,000
|
$54,000
|
|
|
|
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
Construct
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
The current aircraft parking
apron drainage system has sunken (settled) drains that create a potential for
aircraft damage by dragging propellers through the surrounding asphalt. The drains must be raised while
maintaining the integrity and efficiency of the drainage system.
Comments
Thus far the city has not been
notified of any damaged propellers and subsequent liability possibly as a result of the
Non-Standard yellow XÕs drawing attention to the sunken drains and thus the
aviators taxiing their aircraft in a manner that avoids the worse part of the
drainage areas. This does not
alter the fact that the right thing to do is to fix the problem.
Location: Rio Vista Airport
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
The airport is now approximately
17 years old. The perimeter road
which proceeds around the eastern edge of the airport past the approach end of
runway 25 and then parallel to runway 7/25 until it intersects the parallel
taxiway of runway 14/32. The road
serves multiple purposes including access to the segmented circle and lighted
windsock for maintenance and service, it acts as a fire break along the
northern edge of the airfield boundary, and it allows for a safety inspection
of the cattle fencing on the north to prevent intrusion onto the runways by
cattle.
Project Objectives
The perimeter road would be
rehabilitated by cleaning up the overgrowth and re-graveling the current
surface.
Existing Condition
The current surface of the
road has deteriorated to the extent that it is largely impassable during rainy
weather. This current condition
has also allowed heavy brush to infiltrate the surface to the extent that it is
largely unusable except for large all wheel drive vehicles.
Fiscal Implications
Funding has not been secured
for this project. The funding source will likely be the airport improvement
fund, although FAA Grant may also be a potential source.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
$60,000
|
|
$60,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$60,000
|
|
$60,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Clean and
Re-Gravel
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
This rehabilitation is
necessary to allow service vehicle access to the segmented circle and lighted
windsock for maintenance. The road
also acts as a fire break on the northern airfield boundary during the dry
summer months as well as a means to check the fencing along the north boundary
to ensure that no cattle intrusions occur onto an active runway or
taxiway. A broken fence could
easily lead to a safety problem should an aircraft collide with a farm
animal.
Comments
The road also plays an
important part to the future development of the airport. The location of an Automated Weather
Observation System procured this calendar year will most likely be located
along the perimeter road to allow service vehicles to access the equipment.
Location: 3000 Baumann Road
Project Background
Average Airport Beacon life
ranges between 8 years and 10 years.
The Beacon would reach its expected life span in the 2008-2009 time
frame and thus require replacement.
Project Objectives
Replace the Airport Beacon
while taking advantage of any advancement in technology in the motor apparatus
or lighting system.
Existing Condition
Airport Beacon while currently
functioning is showing the wear and tear in the motor bearings,
Fiscal Implications
Estimated cost of replacement
is $35,000 which could be allocated against Non-Primary AIP funds.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05 –
6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
$35,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
$35,000
|
---
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$35,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
$35,000
|
---
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Construct
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
A functioning Airport Beacon
is a safety issue which allows aircraft to correctly identify civilian
airfields from military airfields.
The close proximity to Travis AFB makes this an imperative issue to
address based on time life cycle rather than replace on failure.
Comments
None
Location: Rio Vista Airport
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
Safe night or low visibility
operations on the ramp area, fuel pump area, and between the hangars require
adequate lighting to prevent mishaps.
An additional level of security provided by adequate lighting would act
as a deterrent to criminal or terrorist activity.
Project Objectives
Install adequate Apron
Lighting.
Existing Condition
Current Apron Lighting
provides at best poor visibility for operations even in the lighted areas. There are large areas of the ramp area
and hangar area that are not lighted at all and provide a hazardous environment
to operate during night or low visibility operations. The possibility of a mishap collision in these areas is
increased when moving from a lighted area to a non-lighted area.
Fiscal Implications
Grant funds may be available
to fund these improvements.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
$52,000
|
|
$2,500
|
$25,000
|
$25,000
|
---
|
---
|
|
TOTAL
|
$52,000
|
|
$2,500
|
$25,000
|
$25,000
|
---
|
---
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
Design
|
Construction
|
Construction
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
Safety and security issues
make this a necessary future priority to provide for the secure and safe
operations on the airfield.
Comments
Future plans call for a video
surveillance system at the airport and having adequate lighting conditions for
this system will increase its effectiveness.
Location: 3000 Baumann Road
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
There currently is no
Automated Weather Observing System (AWOS) at the Rio Vista Airport.
Project Objectives
The objective is to ensure
aircraft have access to up-to-date and accurate weather information when flying
in and around Rio Vista Airport.
Existing Condition
As Rio Vista is currently an
unmanned airport, there is no one available nor a system available for aircraft
in the area to receive weather information updates from. The closest commercial field with
weather information is in Sacramento and the conditions there are drastically
different than in Rio Vista.
Fiscal Implications
The AWOS is currently funded
for this fiscal year by an FAA Grant.
This amount ensures the ability to purchase, install, and certify an
operating AWOS.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
$80,000
|
$80,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$80,000
|
$80,000
|
|
|
|
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
Install
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
Accurate and current weather
information is critical to the safe operation of an airfield. Currently the Unicom frequency at the
airfield is unmanned and therefore without an AWOS a pilot must obtain weather
from surrounding airports which generally have weather and wind conditions
quite different than Rio Vista.
This equipment will provide a greatly increased margin of safety for the
Rio Vista Airport.
Comments
None
Location: 3000 Baumann Road
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
The airport was built to
accommodate over 300 hangars.
Currently, we have 50+ hangars.
There is a very long waiting list of potential hangar tenants. We currently have 20 plus potential
tenants who have deposits on record with the city.
Project Objectives
The objective is to construct
additional hangars which result in an increase in revenue for the airport.
Existing Condition
We do not have enough hangars
to make the airport a long-term self-sustaining operation from a revenue
generating perspective.
Fiscal Implications
Three additional Nested ÒTÓ
hangars can be built at a price of approximately $1,000,000 per set of hangars.
The monthly lease could be set at $390 per month this would cover the cost of
purchase and debt service and provide a long term revenue generating asset to
the airport. The additional
hangars will also generate additional fuel sales, additional maintenance sales
providing jobs for several local residents, and the additional aircraft that
would occupy the hangars would also generate additional possessor interest
taxes of which one third return to the city. The hangar construction could be phased over a six year
period allowing the revenue stream to pace and sustain an almost continuous
construction schedule.
Additionally a multitude of partnership opportunities with private
industry may offer creative alternatives to traditional financing. Currently, the Vision 100 Aviation
Reauthorization Act allows general aviation airports to use their Airport
Improvement Program entitlement funds to pay for fuel farms and hangars if
adequate provisions have been made for financing airport development projects
(safe airport operations).
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
$3 M
|
---
|
$500,000
|
$500,000
|
$500,000
|
$500,000
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$3 M
|
---
|
$500,000
|
$500,000
|
$500,000
|
$500,000
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Construct
|
Construct
|
Construct
|
Construct
|
Project Justification
Based on the potential revenue
that can be generated for the rental of the hangars, this project is one of the
few high revenue generating opportunities for the airport. In order to generate fuel sales,
generate maintenance jobs, attract additional jobs such as avionics, car
rental, a cafŽ, a fixed based operator, and additional tax revenue that comes
from additional registered aircraft, the airport needs approximately 200 full
time general aviation residents.
The only real means to secure that kind of numbers is to provide hangar
rentals which are at a premium area wide.
Comments
This project, due to recent
escalations in steel price (tripled) and concrete (doubled), will be a
challenge and will require Òoutside the boxÓ solutions. However it does not change the fact
that additional aircraft resident operations are the key to a long term healthy
self-sustaining airport and the only way to get those new aircraft residents is
hangars.
Location: 3000 Baumann Road
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
Several times a week turbine
powered aircraft land at Rio Vista and more often than not ask about Jet Fuel.
Turbine Aircraft include business jets, turbo-prop, and turbine powered
helicopters. There has also been
interest locally about basing turbine powered aircraft at Rio Vista which would
require the airport to handle Jet A Fuel if the airport is to attract and
capture this market of aviation. There is a market for reasonably priced Jet
Fuel and an additional revenue stream which could be developed through Jet Fuel
sales.
Project Objectives
Identify, evaluate, and
acquire an above ground Jet Fuel system capable of meeting the future needs of
turbine powered aircraft transiting Rio Vista or basing out of Rio Vista in the
future.
Existing Condition
No system is currently present at the airport.
Fiscal Implications
Funding for a Jet Fuel system
is not normally available from Non-Primary AIP funds unless adequate provisions
have been made for financing airport development projects (read safety
projects). However, loans through Cal Trans Aero Division which loan funds at a
State Bond issuance interest rate are available for programs that provide a
revenue stream to the airport.
Additionally, fuel suppliers like Air BP or Chevron Air Petro can make
arrangements to assist in funding a fuelling station by using a part of the
future revenue stream from sales to pay for the Fueling System.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
$150,000
|
---
|
$150,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$150,000
|
---
|
$150,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Construct
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
A Jet Fuel system has two
impacts one on the revenue stream from sales and the second is the ability to
attract and maintain turbine powered aircraft customers. An average sale for jet fuel is
500-1,000 gallons per transaction with a profit of $100-$200 per sale. Additionally, if Rio Vista is to
attract and maintain Turbine Powered customers one thing we will need is a
ready source of Jet A fuel for our turbine powered customers.
Comments
None
Location: 3000 Baumann Road
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
Some sections of the airport
have temporary fencing and most fencing is 4 foot. For security purposes it is a necessary to have a minimum 6
foot permanent fencing around the airport property.
Project Objectives
The objective is to secure the
City airport.
Existing Condition
There is no permanent fencing
on all of the airport property.
Some sections are temporary or only cattle fencing. Most of the permanent fencing is 4 foot
fence which provides little if any security.
Fiscal Implications
Permanent 6 foot security
fencing is an integral part of an overall security system. Together with other security systems
such a video surveillance system and key pad gate access system the theft loss
can be reduced. Also a
greatly reduced risk of collision between an aircraft and any wild or domestic
farm animal can also be achieved.
Funding in the current year FAA Non-Primary AIP grant should allow this
project to commence this year.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
$19,000
|
$19,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$19,000
|
$19,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
Construct
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
This project is required in
order to secure the airport against theft, prevention of other criminal activity
such as drug transportation as well as discouraging the use of airport
facilities for any terrorist plot to the surrounding bay area. Quality secure fencing actually reduces
the probability of an aircraft and animal collision with the associated liability.
Comments
The amount of funds budgeted
for fencing will address the most critical needs of the airport but not the
entire perimeter by any means.
This will be an on going program of assessment, evaluation, and risk
management to determine future requirements.
Location: 3000 Baumann Road
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
Rio Vista Airport has been
visited several times by area Dept. of Homeland Security personnel and Travis
AFB Office of Security Investigations agents. Each have expressed concern over the ease of which anyone
can drive or walk on to the airport ramp areas. Additionally, the ability by which current hangar and tie
down rental customers have access to the terminal area to file flight plans and
check the weather does not exist.
Project Objectives
Provide a key card vehicle and
pedestrian security access system to the ramp area to prevent any unauthorized
entry or use of facilities.
Provide an airport terminal door key card access system to allow the
airport rental customers access to the common area facility after hours. The purpose would be to allow customers
to check the weather and file flight plans after hours.
Existing Condition
Currently, vehicles can access
the ramp freely from an unlocked gate.
In the past locking the gate and passing out 50 keys have only led to
lost keys and the gate remaining open.
Pedestrian gates are also unlocked. Also the terminal currently does not have an after hour
access system.
Fiscal Implications
Greatly reduces the threat of
theft loss from criminal activity and the possibility that the airport could
easily be used for a terrorist plot.
It enhances the customer service of our rental customers allowing them
after hour access to the tools necessary for safe aviation operation. The funds would come from this yearÕs
Non-Primary AIP grant.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
$19,000
|
$19,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$19,000
|
$19,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
Construct
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
Greatly enhance the security
of the airport and enhance customer support and satisfaction.
Comments
Priority is number one. There is a growing desire in Washington
to legislate general aviation security measures. By developing a sound program and security system and
by being proactive we can possibly curve the legislative initiative and save
the airport from an expensive mandatory program and system not tailored to our
needs.
Location: 3000 Baumann Road
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
The Airport was built with a
sewer holding tank system that requires service and will be incapable of
supporting the needs of an expanding airport. Future hangar development with restrooms included and an
adequate pollution containment control system will require a fully functioning
sewer system. The recent extension
of a sewer line to the end of Baumann Road (the primary airport access road)
from the new Northwest Waste Water Treatment plant will allow the airport
facilities to now be connected to a fully functioning sewer system. Installation of proper storm
drains in the terminal parking lot to the sewer line will prevent flooding and
provide the handling of drain water.
Project Objectives
Connect the current airport
sewer system to the new extension from the Northwest Waste Water Treatment
plant. Along with the sewer line
complete the installation of storm drains in the terminal parking lot to
properly handle the drain water into the new sewer line connection.
Existing Condition
The airport currently utilizes
a holding tank system that requires periodic servicing. This system has a limited capacity and
as such will reach its limit with the next addition of hangars with personal
restrooms. Additionally not all of
the drain water from the parking lot can be adequately drained or handled
during the rainy season.
Fiscal Implications
The periodic servicing of the
current holding tank system could be eliminated along with the associated
costs. As the terminal
obtains more tenants and the planned hangars are built out the current system
will require more frequent servicing.
A sewer line connection to the new treatment plant is now economically
feasible with the recent line extension.
Funding for this could come under infrastructure improvement grants from
the USDA or from Non-Primary AIP funds.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
$160,000
|
---
|
$160,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$160,000
|
---
|
$160,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
---
|
Construct
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
Long-term economics dictate that a plan to convert the
current rural holding system to fully functioning sewer treatment system be implemented. This will eliminate the servicing
requirement and allow expansion at the airport without burdening costs. The additional benefit of meeting
future environmental requirements will continue to pay dividends as stricter
standards are adopted. This system
will also allow the installation of proper storm drains in the terminal parking
lot. One of the most critical
considerations for the need for a fully functioning sewer system at the airport
is the ability to then construct a Pollution Containment Control System (PCCS)
which would benefit airport customers as well as city-wide customers with large
vehicles. A PCCS would not only meet strict environmental standards but could
be monetarily self-sustaining.
Comments
None
Location: 3000 Baumann Road
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
The Runway and Taxiway signage
while mostly correct at the Rio Vista Airport will need to be upgraded to remain
in FAA compliance. Other ramp and
taxi areas that not currently utilized will need to upgraded as future airport
expansion takes place.
Project Objectives
The objective is to replace
damaged and non-compliant signage at the airport. Also to prepare for a program of properly annotating
currently unutilized ramp and taxiways for future expansion.
Existing Condition
The signage for the Rio Vista
Airport while mostly FAA compliant will need to upgraded over time. There are also large areas of the airport
not currently utilized which are totally absent any signage. This can be a safety issue in night or
low visibility operations as these areas become more utilized as future
expansion takes place.
Fiscal Implications
Funds will need to be allocated
under future AIP grants and set aside to address these needs as the current
signs age and need to expand parking facilities grow.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/06
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
$50,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
$50,000
|
---
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$50,000
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
$50,000
|
---
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Construct
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
The existing signage while
mostly FAA compliant with standardized runway and taxiway annotation will need
to be updated as the airport expands into currently unutilized areas of the
airport. The current signage
will also sustain normal wear and will most likely need selective replacement.
Comments
None
Location: 3000 Baumann Road
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
Some sections of the taxiway
and ramp area are structurally deficient.
There are cracks in the pavement and the sub grade is substandard.
Project Objectives
The objective is to improve
the integrity of the taxiways and ramp area to reduce long term maintenance
costs.
Existing Condition
Currently, edge cracks and
stress cracks exist on several sections of the ramp and intersecting
taxiways. CalTrans pavement
management assessments have pointed this out as a potential safety hazard.
Fiscal Implications
The longer the pavement is
ignored the greater the cost to rehabilitate the pavement surfaces. By
implementing a Pavement Management program and allocating sufficient funds each
year to address these concerns we can minimize the long term capital outlays
necessary to maintain pavement surfaces.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
$150,000
|
|
|
$37,500
|
$37,500
|
$37,500
|
$37,500
|
|
TOTAL
|
$150,000
|
|
|
$37,500
|
$37,500
|
$37,500
|
$37,500
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
|
on going
|
on going
|
on going
|
on going
|
Project Justification
In order to increase the
potential revenue for the airport, the airport must be maintained to FAA
standards. Professional continuous
maintenance on a yearly basis will decrease the long term weathering and wear
on the pavement surfaces.
Thus in most locations this will prevent the requirement to rehabilitate
a surface by actually having to remove the pavement surface and rebuild from
the subgrade up. A systematic
program of overlaying and sealing the surface will provide the most cost
effective long term maintenance of our airfield surfaces.
Comments
None
Location: City Airport
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
The Rio Vista Airport is a municipal airport that serves
businesses, residents, and other private pilots. Other municipal airports provide supporting services to its
customers, but these supporting facilities are minimal in Rio Vista.
Project Objectives
To complete the following terminal improvements: Furniture, landscape/irrigation, signage
and security system.
Existing Condition
None of these improvements exist currently.
Fiscal Implications
The source of funds will likely be Airport Improvement
Funds.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
|
$17,500
|
$17,500
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
TOTAL
|
$75,000
|
|
$17,500
|
$17,500
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
By providing more amenities to its customers, the City
will encourage greater use of the airport.
Comments
None.
Location: 3000 Baumann Road
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
Project Background
The airport currently does not
have a security system. The airport has had a problem in the past with theft,
vandalism, and breaking and entry.
Project Objectives
In order to prevent theft,
vandalism, as well as minimize the possibility of any terrorist use of the
airport as well as obtain records of incidents at the airport, a surveillance
system is necessary.
Existing Condition
Currently, there is no
surveillance system.
Fiscal Implications
Lower insurance rates for our
tie-down and hangar rental customers.
A surveillance system would act as a deterrent to theft or vandalism and
the subsequent loss for our customers or the city.
The funding source will be Airport
Improvement Funds.
Project Costs:
|
|
Budget
through
6/2010
|
Estimated
Total Project
Cost
|
----------Five
Year Funding----------
|
|
1/1/05
– 6/30/10
|
2005 / 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
|
$7,000
|
$7,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$7,000
|
$7,000
|
|
|
|
|
Phasing:
|
To Date
|
2005/ 06
|
2006 / 07
|
2007 / 08
|
2008 / 09
|
2009 / 10
|
|
|
Design Construct
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Project Justification
Currently, we have an excess
of 50 customer aircraft. The City
must provide some type of security for the customers of Rio Vista Airport.
Comments
This is a number one
priority. This is also a priority
of the Airport Advisory Commission based on previous yearÕs experience of
losses. In order to stem the
losses and provide a means of documenting criminal activity that will not only
act as a deterrent but also the ability to track the perpetrator.