FIRE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FINANCIAL SUMMARY CHART |
|||||||||
PROJECT TITLE |
FUNDING SECURED |
FUNDING SOURCE |
PRIORITY |
2005/06 FY |
2006/07 FY |
2007/08 FY |
2008/09 FY |
2009/10 FY |
|
YES |
NO |
||||||||
City Emergency Operations Center Upgrade/Disaster Plan |
|
X |
General Funds/Grant Funds |
1 |
$70,000 |
$30,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
EMS Equipment |
|
X |
General Fund/Grant Funds |
3 |
$50,000 |
$50,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Hose Replacement / Upgrade |
|
X |
General Funds/Grant Fund |
1 |
$30,000 |
$30,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Fire Department ADA Improvements |
X |
|
CDBG Grant/General Fund |
1 |
$15,000 |
$84,240 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Fire Station Living Quarters Remodel |
|
X |
General Funds/Grant Fund |
1 |
$150,000 |
$100,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Mobile Burn Trailer |
|
X |
General Funds/Grant Funds |
5 |
--- |
--- |
$150,000 |
--- |
$23,000 |
Personal Protective Equipment /ÒTurnoutsÓ |
|
X |
General Funds/Grant Funds |
1 |
$33,000 |
$33,000 |
$78,000 |
$23,000 |
--- |
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Storage Lockers |
|
X |
General Funds/Grant Funds |
1 |
$7,500 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Rio Vista Fire Station #2 |
|
X |
Developer Fees |
1 |
$75,000 |
$2,500,000 |
--- |
--- |
$10,000 |
Self Contained Breathing Apparatus |
|
X |
General Funds/Grant Funds |
1 |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
$20,000 |
$10,000 |
--- |
Station Alerting System |
|
X |
General Funds/Grant Funds |
1 |
$7,500 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Vehicle Exhaust Removal System |
|
X |
General Funds/Grant Funds |
1 |
$45,000 |
$45,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Location: Rio Vista Fire Department Headquarters- 350 Main St.
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background
In disasters, it is imperative that City Government have an adequate & centralized facility to provide for ongoing emergency response and recovery coordination. The Petris Bill, enacted as a result of the 1989 Oakland-Berkeley Hills disaster, requires that all local government disaster workers receive SEMS training. The response to the Katrina and Rita hurricanes are prime examples of the importance of being prepared. While the levee system surrounding Rio Vista is not as old as those in Louisiana, they have already suffered breaches and in the 1970s there was a serious flood in Rio Vista.
The City of Rio VistaÕs Emergency Operations Center is currently located in the fire department community room.
Project Objectives
á Renovate the current emergency operations center to meet current technology demands.
á Revise the current Citywide disaster emergency plan
Existing Condition
The current emergency operations center is 1978 vintage, and as such, has not kept up with trends in communication technology (ie: internet, modern phone lines for each of the EOC command staff personnel, media availability, etc). There is currently no written emergency operations plan.
Fiscal Implications
Because this will be a one time capital outlay project, ongoing maintenance costs will not be a significant issue.
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05
– 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
$100,000 |
$70,000 |
$30,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
TOTAL |
|
$100,000 |
$70,000 |
$30,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
Construct |
on going |
on going |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Project Justification
The current emergency operations center is of 1978 vintage, and as such, has not kept up with trends in communication technology (ie: internet, modern phone lines for each of the EOC command staff personnel, media availability, etc). In the event of a disaster that necessitates the opening of the CityÕs EOC, management staff will not be able to adequately meet the needs of the public due to the inability to provide for rapid communications to field units as well as to the County EOC.
In order for the City to receive post-disaster reimbursement $$ from the GovernorÕs Office of Emergency Services, the disaster plan must encompass a plan for integrating the EOC into the current modern SEMS network.
Comments
This should be placed on the high priority list, due to the likelihood of disasters striking the area.
Location: Fire Department
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
X |
|
|
Project Background
During life and death situations it is important that the EMTs/paramedics have the highest quality equipment. All heart rate monitors must be 12-lead as per County regulations and it is important for the CityÕs equipment to be able to coordinate with the CountyÕs. It is also essential to have auto-plus CPR equipment that is in excellent working condition, as these machines have a 50-80% survival rate; much higher than manual CPR.
Project Objectives
Purchase (2) 12-lead heart monitor and (2) auto-pulse CPR equipment.
Existing Condition
The CityÕs existing heart monitor is not a 12-lead monitor; therefore it does not coordinate with the CountyÕs equipment. The auto-pulse equipment occasionally fails to send the electrical shock to the patient; this is can mean the difference between life and death for this person. The CityÕs monitor is 5 years old and does not meet current standards and the auto-pulse CPR equipment has exceeded its useful life.
There is a 3 day lead time to get temporary replacements while equipment is being repaired.
The City does not have any back up equipment, so when these critical life-saving devices fail, public safety is compromised.
Fiscal Implications
This equipment must be serviced annually and has a life expectancy of 3-5 years, or until standards change. The fire department equipment funds will fund this purchase; however, grant funds may also be available.
Heart Rate Monitor $20,000 each
Auto-Plus CPR Equipment $30,000 each
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05
– 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
$50,000 |
$50,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
TOTAL |
|
|
$50,000 |
$50,000 |
|
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
N/A |
Primary Equipment |
Backup Equipment |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project Justification
Rio Vista paramedics are the first medical personnel on the scene and ambulances can be as far away as 500 miles; therefore, it is imperative that these personnel have high quality, highly functional equipment to provide life saving services to victims.
Comments
This is a very high priority.
Location: 350 Main Street
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background
The delivery of water through hose has been and will continue to be the primary means of suppressing fire. As the fire hose ages, its reliability diminishes, therefore a replacement plan must be adhered to.
Project Objectives
á To replace old cotton jacket hose with newer low maintenance synthetic hose.
á
To upgrade our 3Ó supply hose with large diameter hose
(LDH) to 5 inches and include appliances.
á
To bring our departments hose into compliance with NFPA
1961 (Standards on fire hose)
Existing Condition
The department has a large
amount of cotton double-jacketed hose that is outdated and needs
replacement. Some still have brass
couplings, which have not been produced in years. Many lengths are considerably
worn. We currently use 3Ó hose for
supply and will be switching to large diameter hose for more efficient
operations.
Fiscal Implications
This will be a general fund expenditure.
Project Costs:
|
Budget Through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05
– 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
$60,000 |
$30,000 |
$30,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
TOTAL |
|
$60,000 |
$30,000 |
$30,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
Construct |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project Justification
The fire department needs to update their hose to comply with NFPA 1961. As it stands the hose we have is not reliable to be used on a daily basis, particularly in the emergency setting. The departmentÕs reserve hose supply is also inadequate.
In addition, the new synthetic style hose has become industry standard, and does not require a significant drying time (as does our current hose).
Comments
None
Location: 350 Main Street
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background
The Rio Vista Fire Station was built in 1978. The building does not currently comply with ADA regulations.
Project Objectives
Bring the fire station into
compliance with ADA regulations and provide equal access for everyone. The following improvements will be
completed: complete handicap ramp
access at entrance, ADA compliant parking spaces, and automatic door opener at
front entrance and/or auto safety door reversal system for the bay doors (6
doors), depending on actual costs.
Existing Condition
The fire station is not ADA accessible, which restricts access by the physically impaired.
Fiscal Implications
The City has secured CDBG Grant funds to finance a significant portion the costs to complete these repairs.
CDBG Grant Funds - $78,740
Municipal Facility Improvement Funds - $20,500
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05
– 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
$15,000 |
$84,240 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
TOTAL |
$99,240 |
|
$15,000 |
$84,240 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
N/A |
Design/Bid |
Construct |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project Justification
All public buildings and facilities are required to be ADA compliant. Failure to meet this requirement could result in fines and lawsuits.
The City has secured a CDBG Grant to fund the majority of the costs to complete these essential improvements.
Comments
None
Location: 350 Main Street
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
X |
|
|
|
|
Project
Background
The Rio Vista Fire Station was
built in 1978 to suit the needs of this department at that time. The department
has grown and made a transition to a combination volunteer and full-time
department, with more fulltime staff expected in the near future. Full time
personnel work 24hr shifts, prepare and eat meals, and sleep at the station.
Volunteers are required to do 24-hours of service each month which also
requires them to eat and sleep at the station. The facilities at this station
need to be upgraded and remodeled to accommodate current and future full time
and volunteer personnel, including female firefighters.
Project Objectives
á
Upgrade and remodel administrative offices to
accommodate increased administrative duties.
á
Provide complete kitchen and dining facilities
á
Upgrade sleeping quarters
á
Provide for separate female sleeping quarters.
Existing Condition
The current station was built to accommodate a volunteer department with little thought into future expansion or the addition of 24 hour staff. We have a small kitchenette with limited cooking area and a small refrigerator. Dining areas are inadequate with only a small table for four persons. Sleeping quarters were improvised by enclosing a patio several years ago and purchasing four pull down beds. No heating is provided in this room. Separate sleeping quarters are not provided for female firefighters.
Fiscal Implications
The source of funds for these
improvements will likely be the general fund; however, the City may be able to
offset a significant portion of the costs with grant funds.
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
$150,000 |
$100,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
TOTAL |
$250,000 |
|
$150,000 |
$100,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
N/A |
Design Construction |
Complete Construction |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Project Justification
The Rio Vista Fire Department
is continuing to grow and expand to meet the changing needs of the city. With
this growth has come the addition of full time staff, living and working at the
station for 24-hour periods. It is expected that more full time staff will be
added in the near future and upgrades to the current living and working
environments are becoming more and more evident. Many meals are prepared by the
firefighters and the kitchen facilities provided are poor at best. Separate
sleeping quarters need to be provided for female firefighters and the current
quarters provide no heating.
Comments
None
Location: 350 Main Street
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
X |
Project Objectives
The value of live
fire training is difficult to calculate because itÕs impossible to put a value
on human life. Saving lives and avoiding injury are the reasons fire
departments invest in steel training towers. There is simply no substitute for
live firefighting experience under safe, controlled conditions. Firefighting
professionals agree that live fire training can:
Existing Condition
The 1990Õs brought
new challenges to the fire service due to the inability to burn structures.
Environmental concerns and potential contamination and exposure hazard created
a high risk to the fire service. Current training facilities are limited and
rarely available.
Fiscal Implications
Each year the U.S. Fire
Administration (USFA), part of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA),
administers the Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program (also know as the FIRE
Act). This grant program is designed to assist rural, urban, and suburban fire
departments throughout the United States. These funds are used to increase the
effectiveness of firefighting operations, firefighter health and safety
programs, new fire apparatus, emergency medical service programs, and fire
prevention and safety programs.
Fire Facilities' Mobile
Trainee qualifies for the FIRE Act. A Mobile Burn Trailer offers the essentials
in live fire training, including:
Vehicle necessary
to tow the Mobile Burn Trailer should have towing capabilities equal to the
Ford F350 Super Duty. (approx. 25,000lbs.) MSRP approx: $30,000.00 (included in
estimated total)
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05
– 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
$150,000 |
--- |
|
$150,000 |
--- |
--- |
TOTAL |
|
$150,000 |
--- |
|
$150,000 |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
Construct |
N/A |
N/A |
Purchase |
N/A |
N/A |
Project Justification
Compartment fires that exist
in closed burn rooms present unique dynamics. When fuel inside a burn room is
consumed, a layer of hot, unburned fuel, carbon monoxide and other gases
accumulate at the ceiling. As more fuel continues to burn, the volume of this
gas mixture thickens and the temperature increases. Countering this heat is the
cooler air at the ceiling that is pushed down. This cycle of air movement,
which slows the heating effect, is called air entrainment. The effect of air
entrainment is reduced when the fire is located in a corner. Therefore, corner
fire temperatures must be monitored very closely, or when possible, the seat of
the fire should be kept out of a corner.
In compartment
fire situations, as the fire continues to burn, both the volume of gas and
temperature increases. At 1128¼F,
carbon monoxide reaches its ignition point and can create a flash-over
condition. This may even occur at a lower temperature depending on the actual
composition of the gas layer. Flash-over can produce an instantaneous release
of a tremendous amount of heat. The intensity of a flash-over cannot be
controlled and must be avoided. The safety of our firefighters inside a
compartment at flash-over is extremely compromised when appropriate training is
not available.
Location: 350 Main St
Priority
(Place an X to indicate priority.
1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background
It has always been the goal of
the Rio Vista Fire Department to provide its personnel with adequate and safe
personal protective clothing and equipment. In addition, OSHA requirements and
NFPA standards have required fire Departments to continually upgrade personnel
protective equipment.
Project Objectives
á To continue to provide all current firefighters with updated P.P.E.
á
Meet all NFPA standards and OSHA requirements
á
To supply all new volunteer, part-time and full-time
firefighters with personnel protective equipment.
Existing Condition
Many of the firefighters are
utilizing previously issued firefighting protective equipment. This can result in inadequate
sizing. All P.P.E. should be
properly fitted and free from long term wear and tear. Furthermore, each firefighter
should have their own personal protective equipment, but there currently is not
enough turnouts for each firefighter to have there own equipment, so they must
share. This poses a health
risk to the firefighters.
Fiscal Implications
Due to the ongoing costs of providing all new personnel with new safety equipment, and replacing older turnouts, it is imperative that an annual budget be developed for this.
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
$190,000 |
$33,000 |
$33,000 |
$78,000 |
$23,000 |
$23,000 |
TOTAL |
|
$190,000 |
$33,000 |
$33,000 |
$78,000 |
$23,000 |
$23,000 |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
N/A |
Purchase |
Purchase |
Purchase |
Purchase |
Purchase |
Project Justification
The City of Rio Vista has a
vested interest in each and every one of our firefighters. Their personal
protection is vital to the continued service of our community. The personal
protective clothing used to protect our firefighters from harm has become
inadequate through use and aging.
This equipment has a useful
life of 3 years; the current equipment is 5 years old.
Comments
As the city continues to grow,
it becomes increasingly important that each firefighter be provided his/her own
equipment for everyoneÕs safety including the community.
Location: Main Street Fire Station
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background
Personal Protective Equipment needs to be stored in a vented rack system so they donÕt become contaminated. The Rio Vista Fire Department does not store PPE in accordance with this standard.
Project Objectives
Store PPE in a vented rack
storage system to prevent contamination from exhaust, mold, etc.
Existing Condition
PPE is currently stored on hooks in an open wooden storage system. There is no protection from contaminates.
Fiscal Implications
The sources of funding to install this system include municipal facilities capital funds.
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05
– 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
$7,500 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
TOTAL |
$7,500 |
|
$7,500 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
N/A |
Purchase Install |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project Justification
The condition of this equipment is very important, as it is meant to protect the firefighters; exposing these turnouts to pollutants, mold, dust, etc. reduces the effectiveness of this equipment and compromises the safety of the firefighters.
Comments
The current storage method could potentially result in a Cal OSHA violation.
Location: Northwest Rio Vista Residential Development Area
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background
The Rio Vista Fire Station on Main Street serves as the primary response headquarters for the entire City. Due to the rapid growth of the City it has become apparent that emergency response times are increasing dramatically to the remote areas of town.
Project Objectives
Build a new fire station that
will also serve as a community use center and fire training facility to serve
this portion of town.
Existing Condition
The single fire station in
downtown Rio Vista is the only station to serve the entire town. Traffic congestion and the remote
location of the western district must be addressed soon.
Fiscal Implications
Based on the fact that this will significantly impact the City budget, most, or all of the funding may be acquired from the developers.
Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05 - 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
$3.25 M |
|
$75,000 |
$2.5 M |
--- |
--- |
--- |
TOTAL |
$3.25 M |
|
$75,000 |
$2.5 M |
---- |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
Conceptual Design |
Design |
Construction |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Project Justification:
Construction of fire station
#2 will greatly reduce response times to the northwest portion of Rio
Vista. The addition of a training
facility will give the department the necessary additional space for a variety
of mandated training. The
community room will provide an excellent location for the public to hold
meetings, etc.
Comments
None
Location: 350 Main Street
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background
Over time the fire department
has acquired self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), which consist of a
mask, a regulator, a backpack frame and a cylinder. SCBA are used whenever
personnel enter a structural fire or encounter an atmosphere that is
immediately dangerous to life or health (IOLH) such as toxic gases or
insufficient oxygen.
Project Objectives
To ensure adequate spare bottles exist to replace empty air bottles during an emergency situation.
Existing Condition
The department has twenty SCBA
and thirty-five spare cylinders all of 30-minute duration. Cylinders range from 20lb. steel, 18lb.
aluminum, 13lb. fiberglass hoop-wound and 9lb. carbon fiber cylinders. We intend to replace all fiberglass
cylinders due to age and replace them with newer and safer bottles.
Fiscal Implications
This replacement program will be placed on an ongoing timetable, thus making it necessary to budget a certain amount of $$ annually.
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05
– 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
$60,000 |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
$20,000 |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
TOTAL |
|
$60,000 |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
$20,000 |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project Justification
Reliable and modern self
–contained breathing apparatus are necessary to ensure firefighter safety
during dangerous firefighting operations.
Based on this, it is imperative that bottles be replaced on a regular
interval to prevent catastrophic failure.
Comments
None
Location: Main Street Fire Station
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background
Firefighters are currently relying solely upon their radios to receive notification of fires and calls for service.
Project Objectives
Install a Station Locution Alerting System that uses tones to alert the personnel in the station of a call. This system will also turn the lights on, open doors and turn off electrical appliances.
Existing Condition
The city fire department does not have a station alerting system and must rely upon radios to be notified of a call. This presents a problem during night class when firefighters are sleeping and may sleep through the initial call notification, resulting in a delayed response to that call.
Fiscal Implications
The sources of funding to install this system include municipal facilities capital funds and potential grant funds.
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05
– 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
$7,500 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
TOTAL |
$7,500 |
|
$7,500 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
N/A |
Purchase Install |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project Justification
Installation of a station alerting system will improve
response time and reduce risks of missed calls.
Comments
None
Location: 350 Main St.
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background
When the fire station was
originally built, it was not designed to be used for firefighters to live on
the premises, because the fire department was a volunteer department. Now that the city has grown and
developed a need to have full-time firefighterÕs living at the station during
their shifts to meet the needs of the community. As a result, there is no way to remove the exhaust from the
equipment bay without living the bay doors open.
Over the past two years,
changes in health and safety standards have clearly identified vehicle exhaust
emissions, in particular, whole diesel exhaust, as a cancer causing
substance. In 2003, the Rio Vista
Fire Department applied for grant money to install a vehicle exhaust removal
system, but was denied.
Project Objectives
It is the desire of our department to obtain funding which
would be used to modify our fire station to install a vehicle exhaust
extraction system. This would allow us to eliminate hazardous exposure and
comply with NFPA 1500-2002 Edition, section A.9.1.6.
Existing Condition
No exhaust removal system
currently exists. Our apparatus
generates exhaust emissions during startup, upon return to quarters and routine
pump testing in our facilities. The exhaust routinely infiltrates the
station and all personal protective equipment gear, which creates a health
hazard for fire personnel.
Fiscal Implications
There is a one-time initial
project funding. This system will
greatly improve the health and safety of firefighters and the public.
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05
– 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
$45,000 |
$45,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
TOTAL |
$90,000 |
$90,000 |
$45,000 |
$45,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
Design Construct |
Install |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project Justification
Over the years our
personnel have strongly voiced their concerns about the hazards of diesel
exhaust and how it may be affecting their health, presently and long term. Many of our department members are
aware that there is a solution available, but in the past the implementation of
the vehicle exhaust extraction system was considered an unfunded mandate. Now
that funds may be available we are seeing more pressure to act in the fire
fighters best interest especially on all aspects of health and safety
issues.
In accordance with National
Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), vehicle exhaust fumes are
a potential health carcinogen.
NIOSH recommends that exposure to these dangerous chemicals be reduced
to a minimum.
The majority of municipal fire
departments in California are purchasing modern vehicle exhaust extraction
systems for their emergency apparatus fleets.
Comments
None
FLEET CAPITAL FINANCIAL SUMMARY CHART |
||||||||||
PROJECT TITLE |
FUNDING SECURED |
FUNDING SOURCE |
PRIORITY |
2005/06 FY |
2006/07 FY |
2007/08 FY |
2008/09 FY |
2009/10 FY |
||
YES |
NO |
|||||||||
Five ½ - 1 Ton Trucks – Public Works |
|
X |
General Fund |
|
$75,000 |
$75,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
|
Backhoe Equipment |
|
X |
General Fund |
2 |
$250,000 |
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
|
Bucket Truck |
|
X |
General Fund |
2 |
--- |
$60,000 |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
|
Brush Attack Unit Replacement - Fire |
|
X |
General Fund/Grant Funds |
2 |
--- |
$250,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
|
Fire Prevention Inspector Sedan |
|
X |
General Fund/Contributions |
1 |
$35,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
|
Mowers (for parks) |
|
X |
General Fund |
2 |
--- |
$60,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
|
Police Vehicles (Fleet Rental Contract) |
|
X |
General Fund |
1 |
$80,000 |
$80,000 |
$80,000 |
$80,000 |
$80,000 |
|
ÒQuintÓ Ladder Truck - Fire |
|
X |
General Fund/Grant Funds |
1 |
$150,000 |
$150,000 |
$150,000 |
$150,000 |
$150,000 |
|
Street Sweeper |
|
X |
General Fund |
1 |
$200,00 |
$200,00 |
$20,000 |
$20,000 |
$20,000 |
|
Type One Fire Engine |
|
X |
General Fund/Grant Funds |
3 |
--- |
--- |
$450,000 |
--- |
--- |
|
Utility Pick-up Truck Fire Department |
|
X |
General Fund |
2 |
$20,000 |
$15,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
|
Vacuum Truck |
|
X |
General Fund |
|
$200,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
|
Wood Chipper – Commercial Grade |
|
X |
General Fund |
3 |
--- |
$12,150 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
|
Location: 789 Saint Francis Way – (Corporate Yard)
Project Background
The majority of public works staff do not have access to a vehicle in order to perform their job duties. Sometimes they have to carpool in order to do their jobs, and this is not the most efficient and effective way to service the City.
Project Objectives
The objective is to provide dependable transportation to City staff in order to perform effectively in addressing City needs.
Existing Condition
Currently, the City uses eight (8) pick-up trucks for ten (10) employees to use.
Fiscal Implications
The cost of purchasing these vehicles will be spread over two years to reduce the impact on any one fiscal year. There will be some cost savings by providing public works staff vehicles needed to more efficiently do their work.
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05
– 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
$150,000 |
$75,000 |
$75,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
TOTAL |
|
$150,000 |
$75,000 |
$75,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
Construct |
Purchase |
Purchase |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project Justification
The Public Works Department needs to utilize their resources in the most effective way by providing adequate transportation to its employees in order to better serve the City.
Comments
Leasing the vehicles would be
another option and would spread the cost of the vehicle across its useful life.
Location: Corporate Yard – 789 Saint Francis
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
X |
|
|
|
Project Background
Two (2) 4WD backhoes are
necessary to meet demands of performing ongoing maintenance. State regulations require separate
equipment for use on water, wastewater, storm drains and street repairs.
Project Objectives
Meet the maintenance demands
of the community.
Existing Condition
Currently, we are unable to
meet maintenance demands due to lack of equipment. One 4WD unit is unsafe and one 2WD unit is 30 years
old. Federal and State regulations
mandate that separate equipment be used for the maintenance of water and
wastewater work.
Fiscal
Implications
The penalties for not meeting
the Federal and State mandated regulations are $10k per day for Federal and $1k
per day for State. These penalties
can easily exceed the cost of replacing the equipment.
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
$350,000 |
$250,000 |
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
TOTAL |
|
$350,000 |
$250,000 |
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
N/A |
Purchase 2 Backhoes |
Maintenance Replacement fund |
Maintenance Replacement fund |
Maintenance Replacement fund |
Maintenance Replacement fund |
Project Justification
The current equipment is
inefficient and exceeds useful life expectancy. The City must comply with Federal and State
Regulations.
Comments
The City may be able to save money by purchasing used equipment that is five to seven years old or consider lease/buy option to defer the costs over a period of time.
Location: Corporate Yard – 789 Saint Francis
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
X |
|
|
|
Project Background
Street lights and trees need
to be maintained and this task is being done by a method in violation of OSHA
Safety Standards.
Project Objectives
The objective is to provide
City staff with safe equipment to perform required maintenance of trees and
street lights.
Existing Condition
No equipment is available
other than a 24Õ extension ladder.
The maintenance staff currently uses the fire truck extension ladder to
maintain the street lights or ask the firefighters to perform the maintenance.
Fiscal Implications
The exposure to workerÕs
compensation claims is very high and may easily exceed the cost of purchasing a
bucket truck.
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
$90,000 |
--- |
$60,000 |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
TOTAL |
|
$90,000 |
--- |
$60,000 |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
$10,000 |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
N/A |
--- |
Purchase |
Maintenance |
Maintenance |
Maintenance |
Project Justification
The City must comply with OSHA safety standards and
provide safe equipment for City staff.
Comments
None
Location: 350 Main St
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
X |
|
|
|
Project Background
The Rio Vista Fire Department only has two (2) brush units to protect the approximate 66 square miles of agricultural/undeveloped land, which has nearly no hydrants for its protection. Unfortunately, one of these Brush Truck Units is 20 years old and has over 120,000 miles of use. In 2003, the City requested grant funding to replace this unit but was denied.
Project Objectives
The Fire Department is seeking funding for the replacement of a 1985 Dodge Ram with a new brush unit. The objective is to provide dependable firefighting equipment for firefighters to respond with, and to better protect the citizens of Rio Vista and the surrounding district.
Existing Condition
The Department currently has two brush units in service, a 1985 Dodge Ram and a 2001 Ford F-550.
Fiscal Implications
This unit will replace
our older brush unit, thereby significantly reducing maintenance costs to the
City.
The City submitted a grant
application requesting funds under the FY 2005 Assistance to Firefighters Grant
Program to purchase this apparatus; funds will be awarded October through
December 2005 for projects selected to receive funding.
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05
– 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
$250,000 |
|
--- |
$250,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
TOTAL |
$250,000 |
|
--- |
$250,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
Grant
Application Completed |
--- |
Purchase |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Project Justification
Rapid, dependable response is
imperative in a brush fire scenario.
Due to the potential dangerous effects of the hot, dry north winds,
brush firefighting units must be reliable. The current 1985 brush unit will soon become a concern for
reliability under these circumstances.
The new unit may also be housed at the new station #2.
Comments
None
Location: 350 Main Street
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background
Part of the fire department master plan is to hire a fire prevention inspector to coordinate the increasing fire prevention, plan check and inspection workload. The City is anticipating filling this position in fiscal year 1 of this CIP; therefore, this person will need a department vehicle in order to effectively complete assigned job tasks.
Project Objectives
The objective is to purchase a fire prevention sedan.
Existing Condition
There is currently no sedan in our fleet for this purpose
Fiscal Implications
This is a CalPine funded position for the inspection of all gas wells, etc., therefore, the cost of purchasing this vehicle may be partially funded by CalPine.
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05
– 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
$35,000 |
$35,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
TOTAL |
|
$35,000 |
$35,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
N/A |
Purchase |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project Justification
This vehicle will be necessary for the fire prevention inspector to effectively perform assigned tasks.
Comments
Purchase of this vehicle will become part of the scheduled replacement plan.
Additional Option: Lease vehicle through the County Transportation Center.
Location: Corporate Yard – 789 St. Francis
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
X |
|
|
|
Project Background
City parks are not being
adequately maintained because of lack of equipment.
Project Objectives
The objective is to better
service the community by adequately maintaining our parks by purchasing two
commercial grade riding turf mowers and two push mowers for use in areas where
the riding mower cannot be used.
Existing Condition
City parks are not being
maintained efficiently. The
equipment being used is obsolete or close to being obsolete. The maintenance costs outweigh the cost
of acquiring new equipment.
Fiscal
Implications
The general fund will be the source
of funding for this equipment.
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
$60,000 |
--- |
$60,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
TOTAL |
|
$60,000 |
--- |
$60,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
N/A |
Purchase |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project Justification
Several sporting events are held at the parks. The City must provide a clean and
healthy environment for the community.
Comments
The may be able to reduce costs by leasing this equipment
or purchasing used equipment that is in good condition and several years of
useful life, as determined by manufacturer standards.
Location: Police facility
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background
The City needs to supply appropriate emergency and non-emergency vehicles for the police department.
Project Objectives
Provide vehicles (marked, unmarked, and utility) for the police department.
Existing Condition
The department currently has:
á 5 marked patrol units
á 1 unmarked patrol unit
á 1 utility vehicle
The department will need to add a second utility vehicle during the second half of FY 2004/05 when the second Community Service Officer position is filled. The current rental cost for this fleet will be approximately $80,000 per year.
Fiscal Implications
This is an on-going cost to the general fund. However, it should be noted that leasing these vehicles from an outside source is considerably less than the City purchasing and maintaining them, as one single emergency vehicle can easily exceed forty to fifty thousand dollars.
Often, lease agreements also include regular maintenance costs in the price of the lease.
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05
– 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
$400,000 |
$80,000 |
$80,000 |
$80,000 |
$80,000 |
$80,000 |
TOTAL |
|
$400,000 |
$80,000 |
$80,000 |
$80,000 |
$80,000 |
$80,000 |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
N/A |
Lease |
Lease |
Lease |
Lease |
Lease |
Project Justification
This equipment is a basic necessity for all law enforcement agencies throughout the state.
Comments
This equipment is a top
priority.
Location: 350 Main Street
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background
The aerial apparatus currently in use by the department is a 1972 Pierce Quint Engine with a 50-foot aerial master stream. The apparatus currently has over 90,000 miles and is continually being taken out of service for maintenance and repairs. The aerial apparatus responds to structure fires, vehicle accidents and a variety of other emergency incidents. In the past several months, the apparatus has repeatedly been taken out of service due to many different mechanical issues that have cost the City to repair.
Project Objectives
To purchase a new aerial apparatus that would bring the department within NFPA 1901 standards. This apparatus would be a ÒquintÓ (aerial ladder and pump) unit with a longer ladder to better effect rescue situations. The new apparatus will be equipped with a pump and water tank to act as an engine during fire fighting activities. The purchase will reduce the size of the departmentÕs fleet. This will be accomplished by condensing equipment and resources into the new apparatus.
Existing Condition
The Department operates a 1972 Pierce Quint Engine with a 50-foot elevated master stream. The unit has over 90,000 miles and is over 34 years old.
Fiscal Implications
The purchase of a new aerial apparatus would significantly reduce future repair and service costs to the City. Some of the costs may be eligible for grant funds under the Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program. The City can also lease this apparatus and spread the payments out over 5 years to minimize the impacts on the any single fiscal year.
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05
– 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
$750,000 |
$150,000 |
$150,000 |
$150,000 |
$150,000 |
$150,000 |
TOTAL |
|
$750,000 |
$150,000 |
$150,000 |
$150,000 |
$150,000 |
$150,000 |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
N/A |
N/A |
Purchase |
N/A |
N/A |
Project Justification
This apparatus is equipped with the CityÕs only elevated master stream, a tool used by fire departments during large defensive fire operations, which can occur in locations such as our downtown area. This equipment was recently used during a mutual aid incident in downtown Isleton where it, undoubtedly, prevented the spread of the fire to neighboring businesses. Although the building where the fire originated was destroyed, damage to structures less than five feet away was kept to a minimum. The next closest aerial apparatus would come from the City of Suisun and/or Fairfield (both more than 20 minutes travel time).
Comments
None
Location: Corporate Yard – 789 Saint Francis
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background
The street sweeper that is
currently being used was bought new in 1988. It is no longer reliable and the maintenance costs outweigh
the cost of replacing.
Project Objectives
To purchase two street
sweepers to better maintain the City streets and meet CityÕs needs.
Existing Condition
The current unit is 15 years
old. During the leaf season it is
used extensively for a period of two shifts.
Fiscal Implications
The current cost of
maintenance outweighs the cost to acquire new equipment. One street sweeper will be purchased in
year one and the second in year 2 of this CIP.
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
$650,000 |
$200,000 |
$200,000 |
$20,000 |
$20,000 |
$20,000 |
TOTAL |
|
$650,000 |
$200,000 |
$200,000 |
$20,000 |
$20,000 |
$20,000 |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
Purchase |
Purchase |
Equipment Replacement Fund |
Equipment Replacement Fund |
Equipment Replacement Fund |
Project Justification
The typical useful life for a
street sweeper is 4 to 8 years depending upon frequency of use and the type of
equipment.. Purchasing two
street sweepers will likely extend the useful life of the equipment and will
result in better street cleaning services for the community.
New studies show that conventional
mechanical broom and vacuum-assisted wet sweepers reduce nonpoint pollution by
5 to 30%; and nutrient content by 0 to 15%, but that newer dry vacuum sweepers
can reduce nonpoint pollution by 35 to 80%; and nutrients by 15 to 40% for
those areas that can be swept (Runoff Report, 1998). While actual reductions in
stormwater pollutants have not yet been established, information on the
reductions in finer sediment particles that carry a significant portion of the
stormwater pollutant load is available. Recent estimates are that the new
vacuum assisted dry sweeper might achieve a 50-88% overall reduction in the
annual sediment loading for a residential street, depending on sweeping
frequency (Bannerman, 1999)[1].
City streets must be
maintained to prevent safety hazards, flooding and street debris.
Comments
Maintenance cost for a vacuum
assisted street sweeper are approximately have that of a mechanical broom type
sweeper; the mechanical broom type sweeper is half the purchase cost of the
vacuum assisted sweeper. However,
the typical useful life of the vacuum assisted sweeper is nearly double that of
the mechanical sweeper, 8 years and 4 years respectively.
Maintenance costs for the
vacuum assisted sweeper is estimated at approximately $18/curb mile.
Location: 350 Main Street
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
X |
|
|
Project Background
Engine 355 is a 34-year-old engine that has served the City well over the years, but it is 20 years past the industry standard for life expectancy of fire engines, and needs to be replaced with a new engine.
Project Objectives
á To replace the 34 year old reserve fire engine with a more modern and reliable fire engine.
á To place this engine at fire station #2, upon completion of the construction.
Existing Condition
The current reserve Type One Fire Engine is a 1971 Ford/Howe 1250 gallons per minute pumper. It has well exceeded its normal service life for a fire engine. Under current status this unit will not successfully pass an annual pump test per NFPA 1911 (Standard for Service Tests for Pumps on Fire Department Apparatus). This Standard applies to the conduct of in-service tests of fire pump systems on automotive fire apparatus to ensure that the pump continues to be capable of the performance for which it was designed.
Due to the age of the vehicle new parts are harder to acquire and more costly.
Fiscal Implications
The desire is for the purchase of this unit, and required inventory, to come from developer fees. Ongoing replacement costs should be incorporated into Rio VistaÕs vehicle replacement account.
The below costs are projected at 5% per year according to Pierce Manufacture but do not include labor or inflation cost.
Some or all of the costs to purchase this apparatus may be eligible for grant funding under the Assistance to Firefighter Grant Program.
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05
– 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
$450,000 |
$450,000 |
--- |
--- |
$450,000 |
--- |
--- |
TOTAL |
$450,000 |
$450,000 |
--- |
--- |
$450,000 |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Purchase |
N/A |
N/A |
Project Justification
Due to the age and condition of this apparatus it brings up multiple issues such as safety and reliability to provide adequate service to the citizens of Rio Vista in time of an emergency. The Rio Vista Fire Department strongly recommends that engine 355 be pulled out of service and replace it with a new updated engine that is cost efficient as well as practical for Rio Vista Fire Department.
Comments
None
Location: 350 Main Street
Priority
(Place an X to indicate
priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
X |
|
|
|
Project Background
The Current fire department utility pick-up is a 70Õs era Ford F-150. This vehicle has many miles on it, since it was purchased as a used vehicle from a neighboring fire department. The vehicle is becoming less dependable and needs replacement.
Project Objectives
The objective is to purchase a utility pick-up truck to replace the 1970Õs era Ford F150.
Existing Condition
The current pick-up truck is a 70Õs era vehicle, and as such, is becoming less reliable.
Fiscal Implications
Since the replacement vehicle will be new, the department will have to develop a replacement plan.
Project Costs:
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five
Year Funding---------- |
||||
1/1/05
– 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
$35,000 |
$20,000 |
$15,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
TOTAL |
|
$35,000 |
$20,000 |
$15,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project Justification
This vehicle will be necessary for general fire department operations, such as hauling fire hose from scenes, and other important equipment hauling operations.
Comments
Purchase of this vehicle will become part of the scheduled replacement plan.
Additional Option: Lease vehicle through the County Transportation Center.