PARK FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FINANCIAL SUMMARY CHART
PROJECT TITLE	FUNDING SECURED		FUNDING SOURCE		PRIORITY		2005/06 FY	2006/07 FY	2007/08 FY	2008/09 FY	2009/10 FY
	YES	NO
Boat Launch Restroom Reconstruction	X		Solano County Grant/General Funds	2		---		$15,000	$75,000	---	---
City Fishing Access Upgrade		X	General Funds	2		$20,000		---	$80,000	---	---
City Fishing Pier restroom Reconstruction	X		Solano County Grant/General Funds	2		---		$15,000	$75,000	---	---
Crescent Park Rejuvenation		X	General Funds/Grant Funds	1		$167,000		---	---	---	---
Egbert Field Ball Park Grand Stand Renovation		X	General Funds/Grant Funds	2		$75,000		$25,000	$50,000	$25,000	$25,000
FIBAR Playground Cover		X	General Funds/Grant Funds	3		---		$20,000	---	---	$4,500
Homecoming Park Basketball Court		X	General Funds/Grant Funds	2		---		$20,000	---	---	---
Outdoor Movie Screen		X	General Funds	3		$150,000		$25,000	$50,000	$75,000	$25,000
Park Improvement & Sprinkler Rehabilitation	X		Prop. 40 Per Capita	1		$15,000		$50,000	$100,000	$10,000	$10,000
Portable Stage		X	General Funds	2		$180,000		$30,000	$30,000	$30,000	$50,000
Val de Flores Neighborhood Park Tot Lot		X	General Funds	1		---		$8,000	$50,000	---	---
Youth Center Refurbishment		X	General Funds/Developer Fees	2		$70,000		$40,000	$40,000	$40,000	$60,000

PARK FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

Boat Launch Restroom Reconstruction

Location: City Boat Launch

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
	X

Project Background

The restrooms located near the City Boat Launch Ramp are at least 30 years old and are in poor condition. These facilities are used by thousands visitors and residents and do not meet ADA requirements, and can no longer be maintained adequately.

Project Objectives

Replace the existing restroom facilities with those that can been efficiently maintained and are ADA accessible.

Existing Condition

The current facilities have exceeded its useful life and are not ADA compliant. These restrooms have also suffered vandalism and despite daily cleaning, continue to have a pungent odor.

Fiscal Implications

Solano County has granted $49,000 towards the repair of this restroom facility as well as the restrooms located at the fishing pier. The remaining funds will provided by the City.

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
	$90,000		---	$15,000	$75,000	---	---
TOTAL	$90,000		---	$15,000	$75,000	---	---

Phasing:

To Date	2005/ 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
N/A	Construct	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Project Justification

The City’s Boat Launch Ramp is used daily and sufficient restroom facilities need to be available to users to support the use of this launch ramp and it needs to be accessible to all users.

Comments

Additional funds may be recouped by charging a small recreational fee for users of the ramp.

City Parks ADA Improvements

Location: City-wide

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

The City’s parks do not currently comply with ADA regulations.

Project Objectives

To provide equal access to all users by completing the following improvements at each park site: accessible drinking fountains; accessible restrooms; accessible benches and tables; accessible transfer stations and playground equipment, on-street and/or off-street accessible parking; and signage.

Existing Condition

All of the City’s parks do not currently have accessible drinking fountains, restrooms, benches and tables, playground equipment, and/or parking.

Fiscal Implications

The City has secured a CDBG Grant to fund a significant portion of the costs to complete these improvements.

CDBG Grant Funds - $77,225

Park Capital Funds - $47,175

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
			$11,400	$113,000	---	---	---
TOTAL	$124,400	$124,400	$11,400	$113,000	---	---	---

Phasing:

To Date	2005/ 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
N/A	Design/Bid	Construct	N/A	N/A	N/A

Project Justification

All public buildings and facilities are required to be ADA compliant. Failure to meet this requirement could result in fines and lawsuits.

The City has secured a CDBG Grant to fund the majority of the costs to complete these essential improvements.

Comments

None

City Fishing Access Upgrade

Location: Adjacent to Bridge at Waterfront

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
	X

Project Background

The pier was constructed in 1970s as part of DWR research facility. The construction of the park and picnic and restroom facilities was provided by DWR in return for use of City property for research pier. The facilities are now old and in need of an overhaul.

Project Objectives

Continue to provide fishing access for the public, and integrate into future waterfront facilities.

Existing Condition

The fishing access area needs to be upgraded to accommodate additional use and meet accessibility needs. It needs to be repaired and maintained properly. Support facilities such as park area, picnic tables and restrooms have deteriorated over time. The area needs to be designed to fit in with proposed waterfront improvements (trail, etc.).

Fiscal Implications

The cost of the pier was estimated during the waterfront planning process several years ago at approximately $80,000. However, no specific design or cost estimation was done. Additional programming and design is needed. This project needs to be considered as part of Waterfront Specific Plan process. Potential funding sources are grant funds, State participation as before, and/or possible Redevelopment funding. The operation and maintenance should be considered. Consideration should be as to a charge for access (user fee) as source of operating revenue?

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
		$100,000+/-	$20,000	---	$80,000	---	---
TOTAL		$100,000+/-	$20,000	---	$80,000	---	---

Phasing:

To Date	2005/ 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
---	Planning/ Programming/Engineering/ Design	---	Construct Improvements	---	---

Project Justification

The fishing access park is a key component of the vision for downtown waterfront.

Comments

Facilities programming and policy direction needed. Project should be considered with Waterfront Specific Plan and/or Park Master Plan.

City Fishing Pier Restroom Reconstruction

Location: City Fishing Pier

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
	X

Project Background

The pier was constructed in 1970s as part of DWR research facility. The construction of the park and picnic and restroom facilities was provided by DWR in return for use of City property for research pier. The facilities are now old and in need of an overhaul.

These facilities are used by thousands visitors and residents and do not meet ADA requirements.

Project Objectives

Renovate the restroom facilities that are accessible by all.

Existing Condition

The current facilities have exceeded its useful life and are not ADA compliant.

Fiscal Implications

Solano County has granted $49,000 towards the repair of this restroom facility as well as the restrooms located at the boat launch. The remaining funds will provided by the City.

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
	$90,000		---	$15,000	$75,000	---	---
TOTAL	$90,000		---	$15,000	$75,000	---	---

Phasing:

To Date	2005/ 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
N/A	N/A	Construct	N/A	N/A	N/A

Project Justification

The City’s Fishing Pier is used daily and sufficient restroom facilities need to be available to users to support the use of this Pier and it needs to be accessible to all users.

Comments

This project needs to be coordinated with the Fishing (Pier) Access Upgrade Capital Improvement Project.

Crescent Park Rejuvenation

Location: 123 Crescent Drive

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

Crescent Park is a 0.2 acre park located on North Crescent Drive near downtown. This neighborhood park is currently comprised of a turf area with playground equipment. The equipment contained in this park has never been replaced. The current playground is in need of replacement to meet the Americans with Disabilities Acts and State safety standards.

Project Objectives

The objective of this project is to completely rehabilitate the park. The items to be installed/constructed are: new turf; concrete entry into the park; a modern playground; structure for children 2 to 12 years old, with an ADA transfer station; a sports court with a youth size basketball hoop, and postholes for badminton or volleyball play; directional park lighting, a mushroom water feature, a covered picnic area with four (4) concrete picnic tables and two (2) BBQ grills, and an irrigation system.

Existing Condition

Crescent Park is a building lot that was developed to provide the residents of this neighborhood with a small, convenient tot lot and playground. The playground equipment at this park is very old, has very uneven turf, an unattractive chain link fence, no lighting and no access for disabled individuals, and is not very inviting.

Fiscal Implications

The Crescent Park Rejuvenation Project is eligible for funding under the RZH Non-Urbanized Competitive Grant Program. An application was submitted by the City on December 10^th, 2004. The City is required to provide a 3/7 match, which equates to a 43% match. 30% of the matching funds must be from non-state sources, while 12% can be from other State fund sources. The local, non state funds can also include in-kind costs.

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
		$167,000	$167,000	---	---	---	---
TOTAL		$167,000	$167,000	---	---	---	---

Phasing:

To Date	2005/ 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
N/A	Construction	Final	---	---	---

Project Justification

It is the City’s responsibility to provide safe recreation to its citizens. During the 2004 Citizen Survey, there were comments from Rio Vista citizens in the dissatisfaction of park upkeep and safety. It is necessary for the City to address these concerns.

Comments

The City should find out whether or not this project has been awarded grant funds by November 1, 2005.

Egbert Field Ball Park Grand Stand Renovation

Location: Egbert Field Ball Park

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
	X

Project Background

The grand stand at the little league field is in need of wood replacement. There is dry rot, which creates a safety hazard for spectators.

This field is used by the baseball little league, soccer league, recreational softball and baseball leagues all year long, 6 years old to seniors.

Project Objectives

Renovate grand stand and overhang to provide a safe environment for spectators.

Existing Condition

Dry rot exists in the wood frames and some slats need dirt added. They are too thin and have low spots to be sanded and painted/treated. This facility has reached its useful life and several sections, if not the entire structure needs to be replaced. If the grand stands continue to deteriorate, the City may be required to remove them either partially or entirely to ensure public safety

Fiscal Implications

The source of funds to renovate the grand stand will likely come from the park improvement fund. Funds for this project have not been secured.

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
		$200,000	$75,000	$25,000	$50,000	$25,000	$25,000
TOTAL		$200,000	$75,000	$25,000	$50,000	$25,000	$25,000

Phasing:

To Date	2005/ 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
N/A	On going	On going	On going	On going	On going

Project Justification

The safety of the grand stands may become a concern if renovations are not completed and regular repairs are not made to this facility.

Comments

The safety of the grand stands should be assessed by the building inspection division to determine the level of priority for this project and identify what repairs need to be completed when.

FIBAR Playground Cover

Location: All City-Owned Parks

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
		X

Project Background

Fibar provides playground surfacing that is designed to be safer for our children. Fibar consists of four elements, Fibar Engineered Wood Fiber, FibarFelt, FibarDrain, and Fibar Mat. The Fibar System 300 makes playground area soft and shock-absorbing to reduce risks of injuries and is accessible to all children. This material is certified by the International Play Equipment Manufacturers Association, meets Consumer Products Safety Commission, complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act, is backed by a 25 year warranty, and is covered by product liability insurance. Fibar is an all natural wood product and not chemically treated in any way, therefore, if younger children were to put the Fibar material in their mouths the material does not pose a toxic hazard. FibarFelt® in hard use areas such as under swings, slide exits, and sliding poles is used to protect the surface cover.[1]

Project Objectives

To provide a safe and accessible playground surface for all children that is easy to maintain and more durable than traditional wood chip ground cover.

Existing Condition

Currently, most playground areas are covered with wood chips, with the exception of Crescent Park, which has grass and dirt under the playground equipment. While the bark is an industry acceptable material for surface cover and is preferred over sand, the wood chips can cause splinters, are very flammable, and are easily displaced by the wind. This material must be topped off annually to maintain the required depth for safety. The U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) has determined that wood chips are not considered an accessible playground surface.

Fiscal Implications

This project will use park improvement funds and/or grant funds to fund these improvements.

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
			---	$20,000	---	---	$4,500
TOTAL	24,500	24,500		$20,000	---	---	$4,500

Phasing:

To Date	2005/ 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
N/A	N/A	Install	N/A	N/A	Maintenance Top-off

Project Justification

Installing the Fibar ground surface material and drainage system under the playground equipment at the parks throughout the city will provide a safer recreational experience for children and will allow children with disabilities to access the playground equipment. Fibar is softer, easier to maintain, is ADA accessible, and is not easily flammable.

Comments

The manufacturer states that installations typically require top-offs after three (3) years of use (on some playgrounds, maybe sooner). Top-offs can sometimes be scheduled with other deliveries to minimize the freight cost. 

A cost estimate will be required to determine actual cost to install this material at all park sites.

Homecoming Park Basketball Court

Location: Homecoming Park

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
	X

Project Background

The basketball court located at Homecoming Park is the only public basketball facility in the City. Courts located on school grounds are not accessible to children after school hours.

Project Objectives

Encourage more children and adults to engage in physical activities by providing quality recreational facilities that are accessible to the public.

Existing Condition

The basketball court needs to be repaved, sealed, striped and a wind block needs to be added to make this facility desirable for recreational use. Many residents have complained about the wind and the condition of this basketball court, and being the only outdoor court open to the public for free recreational use, it is important to make these necessary improvements.

Fiscal Implications

Funding has not been secured for this project. The potential source(s) of funds for this project include

developer fees and park improvement funds.

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
		$20,000		$20,000	---	---	---
TOTAL		$20,000		$20,000	---	---	---

Phasing:

To Date	2005/ 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
N/A	N/A	Upgrade site	N/A	N/A	N/A

Project Justification

This basketball court is the only court open free to the public for use, however the court is very windy which creates undesirable conditions for playing basketball. Residents have requested that the City do something about the wind at this location; the installation of a wind break will address this concern.

The black top has not been repaved since it was built and it is breaking down and has numerous cracks. Repaving the court will also improve the conditions and promote increased us.

Comments

City staff is considering multiply options for the wind break, include a fence specifically designed for this purpose, a wind break wall, or trees. While trees may be the most aesthetically pleasing, the city must consider the costs of ongoing maintenance and the installation of irrigation lines.

Outdoor Movie Screen

Location: Various - portable

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

*See attached table

1	2	3	4	5
		X

Project Background

The need for recreation opportunities in Rio Vista was acknowledged consistently throughout the comments from the 2004 City of Rio Vista Citizen Survey. In response, the City is working to expand recreational services for all ages. The purchase of an outdoor movie screen will allow the City to begin citywide movie programs, including summer family “drive-in” movie nights, musical sing-a-longs and October “scary” film fests.

Project Objectives

In order to meet the recreational needs of Rio Vista citizens, an outdoor movie screen provides the following:

· A community-wide program that families can enjoy together.

· Additional recreation opportunities for Rio Vista youth.

Existing Condition

We currently have no such equipment.

Fiscal Implications

Account 010-0300-0150-7905

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
		$325,000	$150,000	$25,000	$50,000	$75,000	$25,000
TOTAL		$325,000	$150,000	$25,000	$50,000	$75,000	$25,000

Phasing:

To Date	2005/ 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Project Justification

The citizen comments in the 2004 Rio Vista Citizen Survey clearly stated a need for recreational activities for youth and families. The purchase of an outdoor movie screen would provide a unique and exciting event for the whole community.

Comments

None

Park Improvement & Sprinkler Rehabilitation

Location: All City Parks

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

The irrigation systems at all of the parks are in poor condition. Park maintenance staff are having to make very frequent, band-aid type repairs to the irrigation systems, or at parks where the system has failed, maintenance staff must use above ground watering methods (i.e. portable hose sprinklers) to maintain the grounds. This is a very inefficient use of water and staff resources. Many components of the irrigation systems need to be replaced in order to properly maintain the city parks.

.Project Objectives

Improve the water use efficiency of the irrigation systems of the parks, eliminate excessive runoff of health hazards, and better utilize maintenance staff.

Existing Condition

Current valves leak, underground lines are leaking, and the sprinkler valves are outdated. The irrigation control boxes are not functioning. The water leaks have cost the city in water runoff and caused the creation of health hazards.

Fiscal Implications

The initial costs of irrigation repairs are somewhat costly; however, the cost savings in water consumption and the elimination of health hazards as the excess runoff enters the storm drains justifies the cost of the repairs. The city may also be eligible for grant funds for the Office of Water Use Efficiency for a Water Use Efficiency Grant. If the City were awarded grant funds, 100% of the costs may be covered.

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
			$15,000	$50,000	$100,000	$10,000	$10,000
TOTAL	$190,000		$15,000	$50,000	$100,000	$10,000	$10,000

Phasing:

To Date	2005/ 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
---	Assessment & Grant writing	Repair Summer 2007	Repair Completed	Maintenance	Maintenance

Project Justification

The water leaks have cost the city in water runoff and caused the creation of health hazards. Failing to identify and make the necessary repairs to prevent excessive water runoff could result in the City receiving National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) violations and having to pay fines.

Comments

The proposed cost is only estimate and an assessment will need to be completed to determine the exact cost.

If the City chooses to apply for grant funds, an assessment of the water losses, the related costs of the wasted water, and the repairs needed will need to be completed to prepare for the grant application, and the project could not go to construction until summer or fall of 2007 to allow for the State to complete the review process of the applications. The initial costs to complete the assessment and the application will likely cost the city about $15,000, but if the City is successful, it could result in a savings of $150,000.

Portable Stage

Location: Various/Portable

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

*See attached table

1	2	3	4	5
	X

Project Background

The need for recreation opportunities in Rio Vista was recently acknowledged throughout the comments from the 2004 City of Rio Vista Citizen Survey. In response, the City is working to expand recreational services for all ages. The purchase of a portable stage will allow the creation and enhancement of many types of recreation programs. A stage would allow outside performances and musical concerts to come to Rio Vista. In addition, a portable stage could be used for various purposes during parades, festivals and farmer’s markets.

Project Objectives

In order to meet the recreational needs of Rio Vista citizens, a portable stage provides the following:

· An increase in recreation opportunities for Rio Vista residents.

· The enhancement of current festivals and parades -- which in turn will help increase tourism opportunities.

· A rentable piece of equipment for community group use.

Existing Condition

We currently have no such equipment, therefore, the City rents portable stages for events.

Fiscal Implications

Account 010-0300-0150-7905

It may be possible to offset upkeep costs through rental fees to community groups.

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
		$220,000	$180,000	$30,000	$30,000	$30,000	$50,000
TOTAL		$220,000	$180,000	$30,000	$30,000	$30,000	$50,000

Phasing:

To Date	2005/ 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Project Justification

The purchase of a portable stage would allow the enhancement of existing recreation programs, such as the Bass Festival and local parades, as well as the addition of numerous recreation programs, such as musical concerts, farmer’s markets and additional festivals.

Comments

None

Swimming Pool Complex ADA Improvements

Location: City Pool

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

The swimming pool complex was built more than 30 years ago. This facility is not ADA compliant.

Project Objectives

To provide equal access to everyone visiting this facility, the following improvements will be completed: ADA compliant parking; accessible curb cuts/ access ramps; accessible drinking fountain; accessible restrooms, changing areas and locker rooms; compliant poll access lift; and signage.

Existing Condition

The swimming pool complex pre-dates the ADA regulation; therefore, it is not compliant with current standards.

Fiscal Implications

The City has secured a CDBG Grant to fund a significant portion of the costs to complete these improvements.

CDBG Grant Funds - $146,375

Park Improvement Funds - $54,325

Permit Fee Waivers - $15,000

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
			$20,000	$195,700	---	---	---
TOTAL	$215,700	$215,700	$20,000	$195,700	---	---	---

Phasing:

To Date	2005/ 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
N/A	Design/Bid	Construction	N/A	N/A	N/A

Project Justification

All public buildings and facilities are required to be ADA compliant. Failure to meet this requirement could result in fines and lawsuits.

The City has secured a CDBG Grant to fund the majority of the costs to complete these essential improvements.

Comments

None

Val de Flores Neighborhood Park Tot Lot

Location: Val de Flores Neighborhood Park

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

The Val de Flores Park currently only has a soccer field. This park is located within a neighborhood and needs to have more services available to the residents interested in recreating at this park. This need was also expressed in the 2004 Citizens Survey. The construction of a Tot Lot at this park would provide additional facilities at this location and fulfill a recreational need.

Project Objectives

Provide additional facilities at Val de Flores Neighborhood Park to expand the recreational opportunities living within the service area of this park.

Existing Condition

This park currently only has a soccer field available for residents; therefore, the park is rarely used by the residents living in this area.

Fiscal Implications

The source of funds for this project could include the Prop. 40 Per Capita Grant funds and/or park improvement funds, and developer fees.

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
			---	$8,000	$50,000	---	---
TOTAL				$8,000	$50,000	---	---

Phasing:

To Date	2005/ 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
N/A	N/A	Design	Construct	N/A	N/A

Project Justification

There is no playground equipment available to the children living in this area of the city. Constructing a tot lot at this park fills a recreational need and begins to balance the services available at other parks but not at this one.

Comments

None

Youth Center Refurbishment

Location: Rio Vista Youth Center - - 225 Sacramento Street

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
	X

Project Background

Capital improvement project to refurbish the Rio Vista Youth Center. The youth center houses the City’s after-school program as well as provides a “hang-out” spot for Junior High- and High School-aged students. Improvements will include carpeting and other flooring, heating improvements, and new, more secure doors and locks.

Project Objectives

· Create a safe and welcoming atmosphere that the city’s children will enjoy spending time in.

· Increase safety and building security.

· Meet community needs and citizens wants, as stated in the 2004 Citizen Survey.

Existing Condition

Currently, the building has cement floors and poor heating, resulting in an unhealthy environment. The building is not welcoming or comfortable, deterring repeated use by school-aged participants.

Fiscal Implications

Account 010-0500-0160-8002

Some funds may be raised through community fundraising.

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
		$250,000	$70,000	$40,000	$40,000	$40,000	$60,000
TOTAL		$250,000	$70,000	$40,000	$40,000	$40,000	$60,000

Phasing:

To Date	2005/ 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
	Construct	Upkeep	Upkeep	Upkeep	Upkeep

Project Justification

The refurbishing of the youth center will allow the City to use the building to its fullest potential and help increase future participation in recreation programs and activities.

Comments

None

POLICE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL FINANCIAL SUMMARY CHART
PROJECT TITLE	FUNDING SECURED			FUNDING SOURCE	PRIORITY	2005/06 FY	2006/07 FY	2007/08 FY	2008/09 FY	2009/10 FY
	YES		NO
Police Canine Program		X		General Funds	1	$27,181	$21,022	$15,011	$37,872	$25,522
Police Emergency Communications Contract		X		General Funds	1	$30,000	$60,000	$65,000	$70,000	$75,000
Emergency Communication Equipment - Police Vehicles		X		General Funds	1	$33,000	$22,000	---	$22,000	$33,000
Necessary Shoulder Fired Weapons		X		General Funds	1	$13,800	$6,900	---	$6,900	$13,800
New Police Station		X		Developer Fees	2	$150,000	$850,000	$1,000,000	$500,000	$500,000
Officer Safety Equipment (Soft Ballistic Body Armor)	X			General Funds/Grant Funds	1	$6,040	$3,020	$3,020	$4,530	$4,530
Officer Safety Equipment (Firearms)	X			General Funds	1	$15,000	---	---	---	---
Officer Uniform Safety Equipment (Required Uniform Safety Equipment)		X		General Funds/Grant Funds	1	$9,434	$1,178	$1,178	$1,178	$1,178
Police Records Management System (Evidence Bar Coding)		X		General Funds	1	$2,400	$100	$100	$100	$2,300
Police Vehicle In-Car Mobile Video and Audio Equipment		X		General Funds/Grant Funds	1	$39,700	$3,600	$3,600	$3,600	$3,600
Replacement of Heating/Air Conditioning System		X		General Funds/Developer Fees	1	$30,000	---	---	---	---
Police Facility (New Roof)	X			General Funds/CDBG Grant Funds	1	$92,710	---	---	---	---
Reserve Police Officer Program		X		General Funds	1	$5,000	$10,000	$10,000	$10,000	$10,000
Surveillance Equipment		X		General Funds/Grant Funds	1	$10,749	---	---	---	---
Traffic Safety Program	X			OTS Grant/General Funds	1	$142,000	$4,000	$4,000	$4,000	$4,000

POLICE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL PROJECTS

Police Canine Program

Location: Police Facility

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

The City of Rio Vista is currently without a police canine unit.

Project Objectives

To provide police canine services, both patrol functions (building searches, tracking) and narcotics detection for the City.

Existing Condition

The police department’s canine program was suspended in 2004 due to the retirement of the police service dog. In the past, the police service dog has been beneficial to the community with locating hidden narcotics, searching buildings and locating lost persons. The City has a need for a police service dog for the community.

Fiscal Implications

The City needs to make an initial purchase of the following items:

· Police Service Dog – Patrol/Narcotics Trained ($7,350)

· Canine Handler Training Patrol Services ($2,500)

· Canine Handler Training Narcotics Detection ($2,500)

· Annual Maintenance Training – Officer’s Salary ($3,410 per year)

· Compensation for Care/Maintenance by Handler - ($6,465 per year)

· Food and Veterinary Services – Budget ($636 per year)

· Vehicle Pursuit Package Chevrolet Tahoe or equivalent, lease option ($375/mo) 5 yr. replacement

·

Grant funding and donations may be available for the initial purchase of this police canine program, however, if grant funding is not available the purchase of this police canine program will have to be funded from the general fund.

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
		$98,097	$27,181	$21,022	$15,011	$37,872	$25,522
TOTAL	$126,608	$98,097	$27,181	$21,022	$15,011	$37,872	$25,522

Project Justification

A police canine unit is a tremendous asset to the community. It is yet another tool allowing officers to better serve their communities.

Comments

Staff is confident they will be able to off-set the major cost of the purchase and training by working with various community groups to raise funds.

Police Emergency Communications Contract

Location: Rio Vista

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

The City of Rio Vista provides emergency communications by contracting yearly with the Contra Costa County Sheriff’s Department in Martinez. The City’s initial cost to Contra Costa for dispatch services was approximately $20,000 annually. Our current contract is approximately $32,000 and is due to expire in June 2006.

The City of Rio Vista is currently exploring changing its dispatch services from Contra Costa Sheriff to the Solano County Sheriff’s Department. This is in part due to the new Radio Interoperability Program (700 MHz) which is currently scheduled for implementation county-wide with-in the next few years. Staff has been advised that the cost for these services will be very close to the current cost.

Project Objectives

The Department of Homeland Security has designated a new 700 MHz public safety radio band. This was a result of September 11, 2001 and other recent events where communications was a critical factor. As a result of these frequencies being released, all agencies within Solano County have been working to obtain some of these frequencies to improve communication throughout the county. Staff has been part of the planning process for this new program and will continue to be involved.

Existing Condition

Contra Costa County is currently providing the City of Rio Vista with dispatch services. The City provides the individual radio hardware (emergency radios and portable radios, as well as the Mobile Data Terminals) in each police vehicle.

Fiscal Implications

This program will be an ongoing expense to the general fund. With the implementation of the new 700 MHz public safety radio band the cost may qualify for federal grant funding, which may reduce the initial start-up costs.

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
		$300,000	$30,000	$60,000	$65,000	$70,000	$75,000
TOTAL		$300,000	$30,000	$60,000	$65,000	$70,000	$75,000

Project Justification

Absent this service, the City would need to maintain their own independent emergency communications center, which would come at a considerably higher cost to taxpayers.

Comments

Following the tragic terrorist attack on Sept 11, 2001, many agencies are consolidating these services within their respective counties.

Emergency Communication Equipment - Police Vehicles

Location: Police Facility

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

The Rio Vista Police Department’s current communication equipment is now due for replacement, and as the current patrol vehicle fleet is being reorganized there is a need for additional equipment.

Project Objectives

To provide functioning up-to-date communications equipment in the City of Rio Vista patrol units. As the department finds it necessary to increase the size of the vehicle fleet, the amount of equipment needed will have to expand. This equipment needs to be replaced every four to five years.

Existing Condition

Currently, the department has 4 marked patrol units. In early 2005, the department will be adding another marked patrol unit by exchanging one of the department’s unmarked units. This exchange will create the need for one new mobile data terminal (MDT) and one new mobile radio. The current mobile data terminals and mobile radios are over ten years old and are currently due to be replaced.

Fiscal Implications

The City needs to make an initial purchase (mid-year FY 2004/05) of the following necessary emergency communication equipment for one new marked unit and one new unit to be used by the Community Service Officer:

· (2) Mobile Data Terminal (MDT) ($9,000)

· (2) Vehicular Radio Modem ($9,000)

· (2) Mobile Emergency Radio ($4,000)

During FY 2005/06 the department needs to replace:

· (3) Mobile Data Terminal ($13,500)

· (3) Vehicular Radio Modem ($13,500)

· (3) Mobile Emergency Radio ($6,000)

During FY 2006/07 the department needs to replace:

· (2) Mobile Data Terminal (MDT) ($9,000)

· (2) Vehicular Radio Modem ($9,000)

· (2) Mobile Emergency Radio ($4,000)

During FY 2007/08 the department should not need to replace any of this equipment.

During FY 2008/09 the department needs to replace:

· (2) Mobile Data Terminal (MDT) ($9,000)

· (2) Vehicular Radio Modem ($9,000)

· (2) Mobile Emergency Radio ($4,000)

During FY 2009/10 the department needs to replace:

· (3) Mobile Data Terminal ($13,500)

· (3) Vehicular Radio Modem ($13,500)

· (3) Mobile Emergency Radio ($6,000)

Grant funding may be available to purchase this necessary emergency communication equipment, however, if grant funding is not available, the purchase of this necessary emergency communication equipment will have to be funded from the general fund.

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
		$110,000	$33,000	$22,000	---	$22,000	$33,000
TOTAL		$110,000	$33,000	$22,000	---	$22,000	$33,000

Project Justification

This equipment has become a basic necessity for all law enforcement agencies throughout the state.

Comments

This equipment is a top priority.

Necessary Shoulder Fired Weapons

Location: Police Facility

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

The City needs to provide the appropriate firearms for police officers.

Project Objectives

To supply firearms that meets standards established and recognized by the City. To provide functioning up to date shoulder fired weapons in the City of Rio Vista patrol units. As the department finds it necessary to increase the size of the vehicle fleet, the amount of equipment needed will have to expand. This equipment needs to be replaced every 6 to 8 years.

Existing Condition

Currently the department has 4 marked patrol units. In early 2005, the department will be adding another marked patrol unit, creating a need for one new patrol rifle and one new patrol shotgun. The standardization of departmental weapons has proven to have a significant impact to officer safety within modern law enforcement.

The police department currently has three AR-15 .223 Patrol Rifles that are at least 10 years old and four 12 gauge police shotguns with tactical lights that are 12 years old. These weapons should be replaced every 5 years. Furthermore, these weapons are shared between 13 people. This poses a concern for accuracy and public safety, as rifles need to be “sighted” by the person using the weapon.

Fiscal Implications

The City needs to make an initial purchase of the following firearms:

· (10) 12 gauge police shotgun w/ tactical light ($5600)

· (10) AR-15 .223 Patrol Rifle ($8200)

During FY 2006/07 the department will need to replace:

· (5) 12 gauge police shotgun w/ tactical light ($2800)

· (5) AR-15 .223 Patrol Rifle ($4100)

During FY 2008/09 the department will need to purchase firearms for new officers:

· (5) 12 gauge police shotgun w/ tactical light ($2800)

· (5) AR-15 .223 Patrol Rifle ($4100)

During FY 2009/10 the department will need to replace:

· (10) 12 gauge police shotgun w/ tactical light ($5600)

· (10) AR-15 .223 Patrol Rifle ($8200)

Grant funding may be available for the initial purchase of these firearms, however, if grant funding is not available the purchase of these firearms will have to be funded from the general fund.

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
	$41,400		$13,800	$6,900	---	$6,900	$13,800
TOTAL	$41,400		$13,800	$6,900	---	$6,900	$13,800

Project Justification

This equipment has become a basic necessity for all law enforcement agencies throughout the state.

All sworn officers should be assigned their own weapons. This is important because rifle sights are very specific to individuals and it is very difficult for a different person to use that weapon. As a result, many officers have resorted to purchasing their own rifles rather than use the shared weapons. Another problem with sharing weapons is when a weapon is used by an officer in the line of duty it is removed from service and becomes evidence until an investigation is completed; this can take months or even years. So in this instance, there are even less weapons available to the department.

For the safety of the community and officers, as well as for investigative purposes it is necessary to purchase firearms in enough quantity so as to assign each officer his/her own weapon and not allow them to be shared, as well as have a small reserve to replace weapons removed from service.

Comments

This equipment is a top priority.

New Police Station

Location: To be determined

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
	X

Project Background

The current facility is temporary and will only meet the City’s needs for the next 4 to 5 years.

Project Objectives

To replace the temporary facility with one that will meet the City’s needs through projected build-out of 30,000. This facility (approximately 17,000 sq. ft.) should be completed within the next five to eight years.

Existing Condition

The current facility is several years old and is beginning to require major renovations and maintenance.

Fiscal Implications

This project will take several years to bring to completion. Initially it will require an in-depth study needs analysis to be conducted, followed by a site analysis study, etc.

· Estimated Cost of Construction ($3,000,000)

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
		$3 M	$150,000	$850,000	$1 M	$500,00	$500,00
TOTAL		$3 M	$150,000	$850,000	$1 M	$500,000	$500,000

Phasing:

To Date	2005/ 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
N/A	Design	Document/ Drawing	Construction	Construction	Construction

Project Justification

This facility will be necessary to meet the service demands the community will expect from the police department. As the community population grows, so must the staffing for the police department. As these staffing increases occur, the facility staff works from will also have to increase in size to meet these needs.

Comments

Staff will work closely with developers to ensure this project is funded as a direct result of the expected growth associated with the proposed development.

Officer Safety Equipment (Soft Ballistic Body Armor)

Location: Police Facility

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

The City needs to supply soft ballistic body armor to all sworn police officers as mandated by state law. Soft ballistic body armor can save the city huge amounts of money by cutting down on the cost of health care as a result of the protection provided to officers.

Project Objectives

Providing effective soft ballistic body armor to all sworn officers and replacing each unit every five years. To give the officers the greatest level of protection from the hazards of their job. This project will meet the state’s mandate of providing all officers with soft ballistic body armor.

Existing Condition

Currently the City reimburses its police officers a specific amount to be applied towards the purchase of soft ballistic body armor every five years. The City is then reimbursed a percentage of this cost through a Federal Grant Program for body armor.

Fiscal Implications

Soft ballistic body armor units can cost $900 to $1,350. The City should establish standards for this safety equipment and procure this equipment for issue to all officers.

Funds may be available through Federal grant sources to off-set approximately 50% of these costs; if these grant funds are not available the entire cost will have to be funded from the general fund.

· Second Chance Summit soft ballistic body armor Level IIIA GFX Soft Trauma Pak ($1,350)

· Extra carrier ($90.00)

· Hard Trauma Plate ($70.00)

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
TOTAL		$21,140	$6,040	$3,020	$3,020	$4,530	$4,530
		$21,140	$6,040	$3,020	$3,020	$4,530	$4,530

Project Justification

This equipment is essential for the safety of the officers.

Comments

This equipment should be considered a top priority by the City.

Officer Safety Equipment (Firearms)

Location: Police Facility

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

The City needs to provide the appropriate firearms for police officers. Officers currently share firearms. If a firearm is used in the line of duty, it is removed for service for months or even years until an investigation is completed.

Project Objectives

To supply firearms that meet standards established and recognized by the City. This equipment needs to be replaced every 6 to 8 years.

Existing Condition

Currently, every officer in the Rio Vista Police Department carries a different firearm. This causes significant problems to the officers and the agency. By purchasing and issuing officers the same firearm it will improve consistency within the department, ultimately reducing liability to the officers and the City. The standardization of departmental weapons has proven to have a significant impact on officer safety within modern law enforcement agencies.

Fiscal Implications

The City needs to make an initial purchase of the following firearms:

· (20) Semi-Auto loading pistols w/ tactical flashlight ($750 each)

Grant funding may be available for the initial purchase of these firearms, however, if grant funding is not available the purchase of these firearms will have to be funded from the general fund.

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
		$15,000	$15,000	---	---	---	---
TOTAL		$15,000	$15,000	---	---	---	---

Project Justification

This will allow for the standardization of firearms officers are carrying on-duty. Such standardization makes it easier to properly train officers and maintain the firearms.

Comments

This needs to be a top priority for the City.

Officer Uniform Safety Equipment (Required Uniform Safety Equipment)

Location: Police Facility

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

The City needs to provide the appropriate required uniform safety equipment to all sworn officers

Project Objectives

To provide required uniform safety equipment that meets standards established and recognized by the City.

Existing Condition

Currently officers supply their own individual required uniform safety equipment, absent any standard set by the City. Without a standard, the uniform appearance of officers is sadly lacking. The standardization of departmental required uniform safety equipment has proven to have a significant impact to officer safety within modern law enforcement.

Fiscal Implications

The City needs to make an initial purchase of the following required uniform safety equipment at a cost of $589 per officer:

· Duty belt - $60

· Belt keepers - $16

· Holster - $125

· Cuff cases - $56

· Hand cuffs - $60

· Baton - $85

· Baton carrier - $24

· Radio carrier - $46

· Latex glove carrier - $21

· Key carrier - $21

· Bladetech Taser holster - $30

· Pepper spray - $18

· Pepper spray carrier - $27

Grant funding may be available for the initial purchase of this required uniform safety equipment, however, if grant funding is not available the purchase of this required uniform safety equipment will have to be funded from the general fund.

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
		$14,146	$9,434	$1,178	$1,178	$1,178	$1,178
TOTAL		$14,146	$9,434	$1,178	$1,178	$1,178	$1,178

Project Justification

This will provide for uniformity of equipment being provided to officers.

Comments

This should be considered a top priority by the City.

Police Records Management System (Evidence Bar Coding)

Location: Police Facility

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

The department currently uses a software program to log the evidence, which currently requires an officer to complete a variety of paperwork to maintain the evidence chain-of-custody. This process is very time consuming, costly and redundant. Under the current program the identification and check-in/check-out process takes a great deal of time for an officer to complete, taking the officer away from other duties.

Project Objectives

This will update the evidence system and provide a more efficient method to track and process evidence. Under the new system all evidence will be coded with a bar code that will match the same bar coding that appears in the officer’s report. With the bar code scanner the location and storing of evidence will be more efficient, add to the tracking of evidence and present better security for evidence items. The new bar-coding will also save valuable staff time required to store and retrieve evidence and other property under the control of the department.

Existing Condition

The department currently uses a very basic, and very limited, software program to log and store evidence. This system, as it is not integrated with the department’s current Records Management System requires some level of redundant entry by staff. This process is very time consuming, costly and inefficient for all officers who are charge with handling, processing, storing and retrieving evidence. The check-in and out process is all done by hand with several redundant entries being made into the software program.

Grant funding may be available for the initial purchase of the equipment, however if grant funding is not available, the purchase of this equipment will have to be funded from the general fund.

Fiscal Implications

· Scanner – Symbol LS1902 TRIG, RS232 Kit ($325)

· Bar Code Printer, Low Volume – Zebra 2844TLP ($500)

· Bar Code Printer, High Volume – Zebra S6000 ($1,300)

· 1 Case of 12 4x3 labels, 500 per roll ($100)

· 1 Roll thermal Transfer Ribbon ($5)

· Serial Cable for Printer ($20)

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
		$5,000	$2,400	$100	$100	$100	$2,300
TOTAL		$5,000	$2,400	$100	$100	$100	$2,300

Project Justification

This equipment will reduce the amount of time officers and support staff must expend to secure evidence/property being held by the department.

Comments

This equipment is fast becoming an essential tool for law enforcement nation-wide.

Police Vehicle In-Car Mobile Video and Audio Equipment

Location: Rio Vista Police Department

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

With police officer’s credibility being questioned through out the nation and citizen complaints being at an all time high, it is imperative the City provide equipment that will support an officer’s testimony about their activity and enforcement efforts. This project will also greatly enhance an officer’s ability to prove or disprove allegations in both criminal and civil complaints.

Project Objectives

The objective of this project is to provide physical evidence that will support an officer’s testimony to secure successful prosecution of violations. This will also prove to be a valuable asset in saving essential staff time expended during investigations of both criminal and civil complaints.

Existing Condition

Currently all police marked vehicles are equipped with in-car VHS Mobile Video Systems. The VHS recording systems have proven to be unreliable, costly to maintain, and time consuming to keep in operation. The industry has now shifted to more reliable units which record using digital

technology. The new systems digitally record and store the video and audio recordings; they are then capable of wirelessly transmitting the digital recording to a dedicated server located within the police facility. After being downloaded to the server the recording can then be downloaded onto a CD to be maintained for any future needs.

Fiscal Implications

As this equipment may likely save several hundred thousand dollars in litigation cost, the cost of the investment will most likely offset the initial and on-going costs.

Grant funding may be available for the initial purchase of the equipment, however if grant funding is not available the purchase of this equipment will have to be funded from the general fund. Initial year funding will be for 5 vehicles. As the fleet of vehicles becomes larger additional cameras will be needed at an additional cost of $7,000 per vehicle depending on inflation.

· 5 In car Mobile Digital recording units ($7,000 each)

· Initial supply of storage discs ($3,600)

· Wireless Interface with Server ($500)

· External Ram Drive to transfer data to server ($600)

· Yearly supply of storage discs ($3,600)

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
TOTAL		$54,100	$39,700	$3,600	$3,600	$3,600	$3,600
		$54,100	$39,700	$3,600	$3,600	$3,600	$3,600

Project Justification

This equipment is vital to support the officer’s initial observations and subsequent enforcement action. Such physical evidence can save thousands of dollars in litigation costs associated with complaints filed against officers.

Comments

This equipment is becoming a basic piece of equipment for every law enforcement agency throughout the state.

Replacement of Heating/Air Conditioning System

Location: Police Facility

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

The current facility is several years old and several (3 out 6) of the original heating/air conditioning components have failed; which does not allow the system to maintain a comfortable working environment.

Project Objectives

Repair/replace existing heating/air conditioning units and provide a comfortable/healthy working environment for staff and the public at their police facility.

Existing Condition

During the summer, staff have to leave doors open to facilitate air circulation; and during the winter staff has to bring in portable heaters to maintain a comfortable working environment.

Fiscal Implications

This project should have a one time impact on the general fund budget.

· Estimated Cost ($30,000)

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
		$30,000	$30,000	---	---	---	---
TOTAL		$30,000	$30,000	---	---	---	---

Project Justification

This is a health and safety issue for the employees working in this environment and for residents who are attending meetings held in the conference room that needs to be addressed as quickly as possible.

Comments

This item needs to be a top priority.

Police Facility Improvements

Location: Police Department

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

The current police facility has experienced several areas of standing water on the roof after periods of rain. Because the water does not properly drain from the roof, it develops leaks in various areas of the building. These leaks have damaged/destroyed various documents as a result of water damage and have occasionally required sections of the building to be inaccessible due to the water creating slippery surfaces, particularly hazardous to physically impaired persons.

The facility also does not meet ADA regulations for accessibility.

Project Objectives

Provide a new roof for the police facility which will allow water to properly drain from the roof and complete ADA improvements as follows: ADA parking (2 spaces); accessible service counter for the public; accessible drinking fountain; accessible automatic door opener at front entrance; 2 handicap ramp access to building; reconfigure conference room and public access areas to ADA compliance; compliant door clearance in public areas; compliant lever-type door hardware; office signage; upgrade existing restrooms to meet ADA compliance.

Existing Condition

The current facility is a modular building which the City purchased used. The building has been moved at leased twice and such moves can create structural problems with the building, especially the roof. The restrooms, entrances and exits, and conference room are not ADA compliant.

Fiscal Implications

The City was awarded CDBG General Allocation Grant funds; therefore, all or most of the estimated cost will be paid with these funds.

· Estimated cost ($50,000).

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
			$92,710	---	---	---	---
TOTAL	$92,710	$92,710	$92,710	---	---	---	---

Phasing:

To Date	2005/ 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
N/A	Design/Bid/ Construct	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Project Justification

This is a health and safety issue for staff, volunteers, and residents holding community meetings in this building that needs to be addressed as quickly as possible. This building is used daily by police department personnel and volunteers, and the conference room and restrooms at least weekly by senior citizens’ groups and other community groups.

CDBG Grant funds have been secured to fund a significant portion the costs to complete these improvements.

Comments

None

Police Records Management System (Evidence Bar Coding)

Location: Police Facility

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

The department currently uses a software program to log the evidence, which currently requires an officer to complete a variety of paperwork to maintain the evidence chain-of-custody. This process is very time consuming, costly and redundant. Under the current program the identification and check-in/check-out process takes a great deal of time for an officer to complete, taking the officer away from other duties.

Project Objectives

This will update the evidence system and provide a more efficient method to track and process evidence. Under the new system all evidence will be coded with a bar code that will match the same bar coding that appears in the officer’s report. With the bar code scanner the location and storing of evidence will be more efficient, add to the tracking of evidence and present better security for evidence items. The new bar-coding will also save valuable staff time required to store and retrieve evidence and other property under the control of the department.

Existing Condition

The department currently uses a very basic, and very limited, software program to log and store evidence. This system, as it is not integrated with the department’s current Records Management System requires some level of redundant entry by staff. This process is very time consuming, costly and inefficient for all officers who are charge with handling, processing, storing and retrieving evidence. The check-in and out process is all done by hand with several redundant entries being made into the software program.

Grant funding may be available for the initial purchase of the equipment, however if grant funding is not available, the purchase of this equipment will have to be funded from the general fund.

Fiscal Implications

· Scanner – Symbol LS1902 TRIG, RS232 Kit ($325)

· Bar Code Printer, Low Volume – Zebra 2844TLP ($500)

· Bar Code Printer, High Volume – Zebra S6000 ($1,300)

· 1 Case of 12 4x3 labels, 500 per roll ($100)

· 1 Roll thermal Transfer Ribbon ($5)

· Serial Cable for Printer ($20)

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
		$5,000	$2,400	$100	$100	$100	$2,300
TOTAL		$5,000	$2,400	$100	$100	$100	$2,300

Project Justification

This equipment will reduce the amount of time officers and support staff must expend to secure evidence/property being held by the department.

Comments

This equipment is fast becoming an essential tool for law enforcement nation-wide.

Reserve Police Officer Program

Location: Police Facility

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

The City currently has one active reserve police officer. In the past the police department was able to recruit and train reserve police officers, who later become full-time police officers for the City. These officers maintained a high level of loyalty to the City.

Project Objectives

To establish a budget to hire and maintain supplemental reserve officers. These officers can be used to supplement current police operations. These reserve officers would provide additional support for the department for special events, parking enforcement, and to augment general patrol functions.

Existing Condition

The police department currently has one active reserve officer. We currently do not have a budget in place to hire, train, and maintain any additional reserve police officers

Fiscal Implications

This will be funded by the general fund.

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
			$5,000	$10,000	$10,000	$10,000	$10,000
TOTAL	$45,000		$5,000	$10,000	$10,000	$10,000	$10,000

Phasing:

To Date	2005/ 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
N/A	Implement	Ongoing	Ongoing	Ongoing	Ongoing

Project Justification

A properly trained and equipped reserve officer contingency provides both vital support services but also serves as an excellent training program to develop new full-time officer applicants for the City.

Comments

The amount of funding being requested will come back to the City many fold with the hours and work product the reserve officers will give back to the City.

Surveillance Equipment

Location: Police Facility

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

Police investigations require the immediate access to surveillance equipment to gather evidence needed to secure successful prosecutions. With the higher demands placed on officers by the courts in securing search and arrest warrants and presenting successful prosecutions

Project Objectives

Provide equipment that will enable officers to reinforce officer testimony and provide a physical record of illegal activities. To aid in the ever higher requirements placed on officers by the courts and the state for evidence of the crime.

Existing Condition

The department currently must rely on the Sate of California (DOJ) for this equipment. By using this system there is no guarantee the equipment will always be available when needed and in those rare cases when the need is now, it would be impossible to obtain the equipment.

Fiscal Implications

Grant funding may be available for the initial purchase of this equipment, however, if grant funding is not available the purchase of this equipment it will have to be funded from the general fund.

· LEA 6320 Synthesized Audio Intelligence System ($5,100)

· LEA 6369S Miniature Portable 2-Watt Scrambled Repeater ($3,195)

· LEA 7020 Wristwatch 15mW Transmitter ($1,200)

· LEA 7020001 Replacement Battery ($4)

· LEA 7054 Nokia Digital Wireless Battery 125mW Transmitter ($1,250)

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
		$10,749	$10,749	---	---	---	---
TOTAL		$10,749	$10,749	---	---	---	---

Project Justification

Sometimes officers are not able to plan far enough in advance the need for this equipment to allow staff to retrieve equipment which may or may not be available from the state.

Comments

This equipment is vital to support the testimony of officers and reinforce the officer’s credibility.

Traffic Safety Program

Location: Various locations throughout the City, with assertive efforts on State Route 12

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

The project will create a team of officers, who will be provided special training and tools, which will allow them to assertively enforce traffic regulations throughout the City, with a special emphasis on State Route 12. The officers will also provide support for other officers assigned patrol duties with selective traffic enforcement.

Project Objectives

At present, the department does not have officers who have the necessary training and equipment to conduct an effective traffic enforcement program. With this project, the department will increase their ability to; enforce hazardous violations, reduce collisions, reduce injury accidents, increase driving under the influence arrests, increase public awareness about traffic safety, impound vehicles when the driver is unlicensed or has a suspended or revoked driver’s license. These officers will also manage the deployment of the Mobile Message Sign Board/Radar Trailer.

Existing Condition

The City recently conducted a city-wide survey of all residents. A substantial percentage of the respondents expressed concern about the amount of traffic on State Route 12, and the lack of enforcement.

The City has experienced a nearly three fold increase in the number of injury collisions from 11 in 2001 to 32 during 2002. Speeding was the primary collision factor in approximately 50% of the total collisions reported in 2001. Speed related injury collisions have increased from 10 during 2001 to 15 in 2002.

The City has a significant traffic problem with State Route 12. CalTrans traffic volume data shows that the average daily vehicle volume on State Route 12 within the City has increased

from 13,000 vehicles per day in 1997 to 21,600 vehicles per day in 2002. Staff feels current numbers are much higher and that these numbers will continue to climb in coming years. The current rates are so high, it presents a serious risk to school aged children and senior citizens who must cross State Route 12 during peak traffic flows. At present, the department lacks the training and equipment to address this significant issue.

Fiscal Implications

This program qualified for grant funding from the State of California Office of Traffic Safety. However, additional funding will be required from the general fund.

· 2 Mobile message / speed control trailers ($44,000)

· 7 Portable PAS Devices and calibration equipment (10,000)

· 2 Motorcycles ($42,000)

· Motorcycle Communications Equipment ($24,000)

· Speed Enforcement Tools ($14,000)

· Yearly Maintenance ($4,000)

· Training ($4,000)

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
		$158,000	$142,000	$4,000	$4,000	$4,000	$4,000
TOTAL		$158,000	$142,000	$4,000	$4,000	$4,000	$4,000

Project Justification

This project will significantly increase the effectiveness of the department in their effort to reduce the number of traffic accidents (injury, non-injury, and fatal) within the City.

Comments

Staff has seen the need for this project escalate very rapidly this past year, and realizes it must be a top priority for the City.

PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY CAPITAL FINANCIAL SUMMARY CHART
PROJECT TITLE	FUNDING SECURED		FUNDING SOURCE		PRIORITY		2005/06 FY		2006/07 FY		2007/08 FY		2008/09 FY		2009/10 FY
	YES	NO
Emergency Back-up Power (All City Facilities)		X		General Funds		1		$100,000		$100,000		$100,000		---		---
Public Works Facility & Corporation Yard	X			Developer Fees		1		$1,250,000		---		---		---		---

PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY CAPITAL PROJECTS

Emergency Back-up Power (All City Facilities)

Location: All City Buildings and Critical Infrastructure

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

Due to Rio Vista’s remote location and frequent winds, power outages occur multiple times during the year. Additional power outages may also occur as a result of the age of the facilities. Such outages are not only inconvenient, but they can lead to health hazards if critical infrastructure suffers failures as a result of the power outage.

Project Objectives

Provide emergency back-up power at all city facilities, with priority given to critical infrastructure facilities and public safety buildings (e.g. Police and Fire Departments).

Existing Condition

When power outages occur in the city there is no back-up power for any of the city’s facilities including the water and wastewater facilities, and the police and fire department buildings. At some facilities, manual generators are available; however, the power generated by this equipment is extremely low. During such outages public safety is comprised. An example would be the fact that the fire department bay doors are power operated, so when there is no power, the doors cannot be opened.

Fiscal Implications

Priority will be given to critical infrastructure and public safety facilities; the non-critical facilities will have installations completed in later phases.

Montezuma Fire District has agreed to pay $4,000.

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
			$100,000	$100,000	$100,000	---	---
TOTAL			$100,000	$100,000	$100,000	---	---

Phasing:

To Date	2005/ 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
N/A	Critical and Public Safety Facilities	Non-Critical facilities	Non-Critical facilities	N/A	N/A

Project Justification

Given the frequency of power outages in the City, it is very important that at least the critical and public safety facilities avoid power interruptions to maintain public safety.

Comments

None

Public Works Facility & Corporation Yard

Location: Northwest Wastewater Facility on Airport Road

Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)

1	2	3	4	5
X

Project Background

A new corporation yard and public works facilities (offices, maintenance garage, possibly wash facility) will be needed as growth occurs.

Project Objectives

Provide adequate vehicle yard, maintenance facility and accommodations for City crews. Possible joint use with School District, County and Cal Trans, and others, particularly bus/truck wash facility. The City also needs to construct on-site gasoline and diesel fuel storage tanks, covered storage for city vehicles (carport), covered and enclosed storage for replacement parts, and uncovered outdoor storage bins for gravel, asphalt, and sand (a minimum of 4 bins).

Existing Condition

Current facilities at St. Francis Road are obsolete and inadequate. The NWWTP will include an administration building and yard which will be shared with PW staff and equipment that will accommodate the next few years. A new facility is still needed for five years and beyond.

Fiscal Implications

Cost of simple corporation yard and City PW facility is estimated at $1,000,000, to accommodate 30 employees (total future build out need). Unclear as to whether this can be constructed in phases and timing. The following assumes two phase construction, with first phase (beyond WWTP facility) occurring at the end of the five year period.

Project Costs:

	Budget through 6/2010	Estimated Total Project Cost	----------Five Year Funding----------
1/1/05 – 6/30/10			2005 / 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
	$1,250,000	$1,250,000	$1,250,000	---	---	---	---
TOTAL	$1,250,000	$1,250,000	$1,250,000	---	---	---	---

Phasing:

To Date	2005/ 06	2006 / 07	2007 / 08	2008 / 09	2009 / 10
N/A	Construction	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Project Justification

Provide adequate equipment maintenance, storage, and facilities for City crews; joint-use efficiency with other agencies.

Comments

Need to assess and program facilities as part of AB 1600 assessment.

---

[1] Product information obtained from the Fibar, Inc. website, www.fibar.com .