TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROJECTS
Location: Citywide
Priority (Place
an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Project
Background:
Many of the CityÕs sidewalks, curbs and gutters are not ADA compliant, and there are not enough ADA parking spaces available to the public on Main Street.
Project Objectives:
The objective is to install 25-30 ADA curb ramps and to provide 5 ADA parking spaces near businesses along Main Street.
Existing Condition:
The new sections of the City are compliant, however many sections of the older sections of the city are not ADA compliant.
Fiscal Implications:
The City received a CDBG General Allocation Grant award to
install ADA ramps at 25-30 intersections and 5 parking spaces.
The grant will
fund $329,890 of these improvements and the City will fund $101,500 using
Transportation Improvement funds.
Project
Costs:
|
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five Year Funding---------- |
||||
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
|
$431,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
$431,390 |
$431,390 |
$431,390 |
|
|
|
|
Phasing:
|
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
|
Design Bid Construct |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project
Justification
It is the responsibility of the City to comply with ADA standards.
Comments
None.
Location: Airport Road – 1.4 miles
Priority (Place
an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Project
Background
Airport Road is failing from Church Road to Liberty Island Road. The Watson Hallow and Macks Channel Bridges need replacing. Traffic from proposed residential developments as well as Trilogy will exceed the capacity of the road.
Project
Objectives
Reconstruct and widen roadway, bridge will be replaced, curb, gutter and sidewalk, street lighting and landscaping installed.
Existing
Condition
The road is in poor condition. It has been blade patched twice in the last ten years from
the airport entrance to Church Road.
Fiscal
Implications
The costs indicated are only estimates; the actual costs are not known at this time.
This project will be developer funded.
Project
Costs:
|
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five Year Funding---------- |
||||
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
$5 M |
$2 M |
$3 M |
--- |
--- |
--- |
|
TOTAL |
|
$5 M |
$2 M |
$3 M |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
|
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
Design Complete |
Construct |
Construct |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project
Justification
This road is a new entrance to the Trilogy community, which will bring more traffic, thus making it a major arterial for the City of Rio Vista.
Comments
None.
Location: Downtown Rio Vista - _Alleys behind Main Street and connecting between Main and cross streets (Sacramento and Montezuma); Construct new parking facilities in various locations
Priority (Place
an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Project Background
In 2002, Main Street was reconstructed and new landscaping, street lighting and amenities were added. Although only two on-street spaces per block were removed, the project has emphasized the need for loading and delivery parking, as well as long term parking needs for downtown employees and residents.
Project Objectives
Provide for adequate loading and delivery, employee, resident and customer parking in the downtown area, particularly in locations adjacent to Main Street.
Existing Condition
Alleys are not designed or signed for loading and unloading, yet they are the only real alternative to blocking portions of Main Street; parking opportunities are not fully utilized. Only one small municipal lot exists; others are needed and will be required as commercial development and rehabilitation of existing buildings occur.
Fiscal Implications
Alleys and parking facilities need to be maintained. Capital development cost is approximately $7,000 – 10,000 per space for surface parking, plus land acquisition cost. Approximately 50 spaces will be needed in the next five years (perhaps more). Land needed: approximately 400 sq. ft. per space, or about 20,000 sq. ft. (1/2 acre). Land cost: $12/sq. ft. or $5,000 per space. Total cost: $12,000 - $15,000/space or $600,000 - $750,000 in total. Funding sources are: private construction, sale of City land(?) temporary use of vacant lot(s), grant funds, downtown improvement district, and Redevelopment funds/bonds.
Project
Costs:
|
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five Year Funding---------- |
||||
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
$850,000 |
$100,000 |
$375,000 |
--- |
$125,000 |
$250,000 |
|
TOTAL |
|
$850,000 |
$100,000 |
$375,000 |
--- |
$125,000 |
$250,000 |
Phasing:
|
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
Construct |
Planning/ Programming Design/ Engineering |
Land Acquisition/ Construction (25 spaces) |
--- |
Land Acquisition (25 Spaces) |
Construction (25 Spaces) |
Project Justification
Loading & delivery problems already exist and will become worse with imminent projects (renovation of restaurants, Rio Vista Hotel, additional population visiting downtown, etc.). Employee and visitor (customer) parking currently beginning to be strained in some blocks; anticipated renovation of Rio Vista and ram hotels, plus other new businesses will increase demand by 25 – 30 spaces, including long term (24-hour) parking needs for residential apartments (hotels). Business climate will not support current or future business without adequate parking. The goal is enhancement and preservation of downtown as central business district, traffic calming, reduction of auto trips, lower air pollution, improved pedestrian and visitor access to downtown commercial district and the waterfront.
Comments
Need to research land cost in this market. Consider utilizing some alley cross- connections, City vacant land for new temporary (or permanent) parking lots?
Location: Citywide
Priority (Place
an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Project
Background
As the City develops it will be important to provide bike lanes and routes throughout the City.
Project
Objectives
Construct safe bike routes throughout the city to encourage residents to use alternative modes of travel to promote healthy behavior and reduce pollution.
Existing
Condition
The City does not have any designated bike lanes.
Fiscal
Implications
Transportation Improvement funds will be the likely source of funding for this project.
Project
Costs:
|
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five Year Funding---------- |
||||
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
|
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
|
TOTAL |
$125,000 |
$125,000 |
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
Phasing:
|
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
N/A |
20% |
20% |
20% |
20% |
20% |
Project
Justification
The City and its developers will need to provide bike routes and alternative methods of transportation throughout the City.
Comments
Funding for additional transportation projects can be linked to bike lanes, walking lanes, etc.
Location: Center Street
Priority (Place
an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Project Background
The section of Center Street to be improved is a short section only 150 feet long and 40 feet wide and begins at third street and ends at an alley. Houses are located on only one side of the street.
Project Objectives
Pave the street and install sidewalks on only the frontage side of the street.
Existing Condition
The street is not paved and does not have any sidewalks.
Fiscal Implications
Transportation improvements funds will likely be the funding source, but TDA funds might also be available to fund a portion of these costs.
Project
Costs:
|
|
Budgeted through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five Year Funding---------- |
||||
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
$200,000 |
--- |
$200,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
|
TOTAL |
|
$200,000 |
--- |
$200,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
|
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
N/A |
N/A |
Design Construct |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project
Justification
This project is a redevelopment demonstration project. Paving this road and constructing a sidewalk will help to revive this area.
Comments
None
Location: Church Road – 1 mile
Priority (Place
an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background
Church Road has become a reconstruct project. Cement and construction traffic has basically destroyed it and it is not designed to accommodate the quantity of traffic that will be using this road in the near future.
Project Objectives
Reconstruct and widen roadway, bridge will be replaced, curb, gutter and sidewalk, street lighting and landscaping installed.
Existing Condition
Most of this road is a reconstruct job. The pavement is breaking up. There are dips in the lanes with sub-base failures making it almost unsafe to drive.
Fiscal Implications
The funding source for this project will be developer fees. The developers of residential communities that will be using these roads will be reconstructing this road.
Project
Costs:
|
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five Year Funding---------- |
||||
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
$1.8 M |
$900,000 |
$900,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
|
TOTAL |
|
$1.8 M |
$900,000 |
$900,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
|
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Design/Bid/ Construct |
N/A |
N/A |
Project
Justification
Almost the entire length of Church Road has failed.
Comments
The priority
level corresponds with the anticipated residential developments.
Location: Adjacent to City Hall
Priority (Place
an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Project Background
The City dock needs to be upgraded to accommodate additional use and meet accessibility needs. The boat launch needs to be expanded to accommodate growth, and the current location conflicts with City and downtown events, and precludes future City Hall/Civic Center expansion.
Project Objectives
á Provide facilities more suited to serving boating public.
á Enlarge to accommodate future growth.
á Relocate boat launch to facilitate more effective use of City property downtown (Civic Center complex, etc.)
Existing Condition
The current City dock is obsolete and nearing the end of its useful life. It is too small to accommodate future needs or expansion required by growth. The boat launch is still functional but should be expanded from a single to a double ramp facility. The parking area currently is not adequate on peak-demand days and overflow parking impacts downtown businesses and surrounding neighborhood.
Fiscal Implications
The cost of constructing the new dock at Main Street was previously estimated at $150 - $200,000, plus design. A state grant of $90,000 was received in 2001 for this purpose. Since it was only 50% of the cost, the funds were set aside to match future funding sources. The boat launch was constructed with State Boating & Waterways funding over 20 years ago. After 20 years, the City is free to relocate or remove the facility and may request funding for the new and expanded facility. The cost of the relocation of the boat launch is not currently known. These projects also need to be part of the Municipal Facilities ÒMaster PlanÓ needs assessment.
Project
Costs:
|
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five Year Funding---------- |
||||
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
$750,000+/- |
$50,000 |
$200,000 |
--- |
$500,000 |
--- |
|
TOTAL |
|
$750,000+/- |
$50,000 |
$200,000 |
--- |
$500,000 |
--- |
Phasing:
|
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
|
Planning/ ProgrammingEngineering/ Design |
Replace Dock |
--- |
Remove/ construct new boat launch |
--- |
Project Justification
The new dock is a key component of the vision for the waterfront at Main Street. Relocating the boat launch will allow better accommodation of the boating public while removing impediment to the expansion of City facilities.
Comments
Facilities programming and policy direction needed.
Location: City-wide
Priority (Place
an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background
Over time curbs, gutters and sidewalks must be replaced due to normal wear and tear and tree roots uplifting sections. These repairs are complaint driven.
Project Objectives
Maintain safe functional curbs, gutters, and sidewalks for the community.
Existing Condition
Every year the city replaces sections of curb, gutter, and sidewalks. There is a limited amount of funds available to perform these repairs, therefore the repairs are only completed when complaints have been voiced to the City.
Fiscal Implications
The City should budget approximately $40,000 per year to replace
curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. It
costs about $40/ft., so this amount of money will fund the replacement of
approximately 1,000 feet of sidewalk.
This is an on-going maintenance need.
Project
Costs:
|
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five Year Funding---------- |
||||
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
|
$40,000 |
$40,000 |
$40,000 |
$40,000 |
$40,000 |
|
TOTAL |
$200,000 |
|
$40,000 |
$40,000 |
$40,000 |
$40,000 |
$40,000 |
Phasing:
|
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project Justification
If the city is made aware of a hazard within a public right of way, the City has legal responsibility to remove or repair the hazard, and/or direct the responsible party to do so.
Comments
The state vehicle code states the responsible party is the property owner whose frontage meets the sidewalk; however, Rio Vista, like many agencies, has not enforced this code and has chosen to fund the replacements entirely.
Location: Highway
12, various locations between City Limits on west, and the Helen Madera
Memorial Bridge.
Priority (Place
an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Project
Background
Since 1990, all City and STA transportation studies have pointed to the need for major improvements to Highway 12 in order to accommodate planned growth in Rio Vista and anticipated increases in through traffic. The existing intersections and frontage in the commercial district between Drouin Drive and the bridge need sidewalks, curbing, landscaping, and better traffic control. The 2001 General Plan established a vision for Hwy 12 that foresaw capacity improvements as well as a need to preserve the character of Rio Vista by slowing traffic speeds and avoiding a Òtypical Cal TransÓ approach to highway expansion as seen in Suisun City.
Project Objectives
á Provide for improvements currently needed in existing developed areas, make the highway frontage more attractive and safer for both vehicles and pedestrians.
á Continue to allow for adequate access and visibility for current and new businesses.
á Provide improvements necessary for initial phases of proposed new developments.
Existing Condition
The road between Drouin Drive and the Bridge is a wide two-lane roadway without curbing, sidewalks and landscaping in many locations. Turning movements are uncontrolled except at the Hillside signal. West of Drouin Drive, Highway 12 is a two lane rural highway, except for the Summerset Drive intersection. Summerset and Liberty Island Road intersections may need additional improvements to accommodate Brann and Gibbs Ranches (currently being studied).
Fiscal Implications
The total capital costs for the existing corridor are unknown, but could approach $20 million. The operation and maintenance costs need to be included in Cads, conditions of approval for new development. The areas constructed by grant funds and other City funds will need additional operating and maintenance funds. Funding sources include developer fees, developer construction, state and federal funds through MTC, STA and CalTrans. Possible Redevelopment participation and assessment districts required as conditions of approval for expanding commercial development may also be funding sources.
Project
Costs:
|
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five Year Funding---------- |
||||
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
$500,000 |
--- |
$250,000 |
$250,000 |
--- |
--- |
|
TOTAL |
|
$500,000 |
--- |
$250,000 |
$250,000 |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
|
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
N/A |
N/A |
Planning/ Programming Design/ Engineering |
Construction |
N/A |
N/A |
Project Justification
It is the CityÕs responsibility to provide the community with adequate transportation infrastructure, implement vision of General Plan. Improvements needed to accommodate new development traffic generation and increasing through traffic from Solano and surrounding counties. Streetscape, intersection and capacity improvements needed on existing commercial ÒstripÓ between Drouin Drive and Bridge; Intersection, signalization and capacity improvements will be required in sections between western City Limits at Brann Ranch to Church Road; and between Church Road and Drouin Drive.
Comments
It is unclear as to extent of improvements or cost in first five years. Transportation master plan and corridor study will define specific nature of improvements and programming, as well as long range options for future bypass and new bridge at Airport Road.
Location: Liberty Island Road – 2 miles
Priority (Place
an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Project
Background
Liberty Island Road is failing due to heavy traffic. Cement trucks and vacuum trucks use it daily.
The black top and road base are too thin for these weights. The bridge has reached its useful life.
Project
Objectives
Reconstruct and widen roadway, bridge will be replaced, curb, gutter and sidewalk, street lighting and landscaping installed.
Existing
Condition
Rapid road failures are becoming a traffic hazard.
Fiscal
Implications
The cost of maintaining this road exceeds the cost of rebuilding. This project will be funded with developer fees.
Project
Costs:
|
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five Year Funding---------- |
||||
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
$2.5 M |
$1 M |
$1.5 M |
--- |
--- |
--- |
|
TOTAL |
|
$2.5 M |
$1 M |
$1.5 M |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
|
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
Design Complete |
N/A |
Construct |
Construct |
N/A |
N/A |
Project
Justification
This road is currently unsafe and creates a safety hazard due to the current structural sections. This road is a major arterial for the City of Rio Vista and alternate route for Highway 12 traffic.
Comments
None
Opticom Traffic Signal Pre-empt System
Location: City-wide
Priority (Place
an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Project
Background
The normal operation of any traffic signal
controlled intersection is designed for the maximum and efficient throughput of
vehicular traffic.
Unfortunately, a common occurrence at any
intersection is traffic back-up, which can require many signaling cycles to
clear. Without the ability to change the operation of the traffic signals
themselves, police and emergency response vehicles can also be forced to sit in
traffic, thus dramatically increasing their response times to crime scenes and
fire or medical emergencies.
Furthermore, even without heavy traffic, a
police or emergency response vehicle entering a traffic signal controlled
intersection at a high rate of speed places all motorists (and sometimes
pedestrians) at extreme risk.
Traffic signal preemption is an optical
communications system that allows preemption-equipped vehicles to alter the
normal operation of preemption-equipped traffic signals.
Project Objectives
Install Opticom traffic signal pre-empt system on all existing traffic signals and transmitter devices in all emergency vehicles to override the signal to provide a green light for its approach.
Existing Condition
The City does not have these devices on any of the CityÕs traffic signals.
Fiscal Implications
The source of funds will likely be the General Fund.
Project
Costs:
|
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five Year Funding---------- |
||||
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
|
--- |
--- |
$75,000 |
--- |
--- |
|
TOTAL |
$75,000 |
|
--- |
--- |
$75,000 |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
|
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project
Justification
This improves safety by allowing emergency vehicles to reach their destinations quicker.
Comments
An overview of a typical scenario is as follows:
A fire truck is dispatched to an
emergency.
The fire truck is equipped with multiple
emergency warning lights and a sirenÉ The fire truck is also equipped with a
preemption transmitter, which, in operation, is a high intensity forward-facing
strobe light that is flashing at a rapid rate - much faster than normal
attention-getting lights on the fire truck.
When the fire truck approaches within
1,800 feet (line-of-sight) of a preemption-equipped traffic signal controlled
intersection, the preemption detector (normally mounted on the cross-arm that
suspends the traffic signal) "sees" the fire truckÕs preemption transmitter
and locks onto its flashing strobe.
Once the traffic signal "sees"
the fire truck, it begins to initiate a "preemption sequence" of the
actual traffic signal that is different from normal operation.
If the fire truck already has a green
light, the light will remain green. Any other direction that also has a green
light (usually the opposite direction) will first get a yellow light, then red.
When all of the other directions are then
red, and the fire truckÕs direction is the only one that is green, the left turn
arrow will illuminate (if one exists), and a brilliant white flood lamp mounted
near the traffic signal will begin to flash. This flood lamp tells the driver
of the fire truck that he now has control of the intersection, and complete
right-of-way.
If the fire truck has a red light, any
other direction that has a green light will transition to yellow, then red.
When all the directions (including the fire truckÕs) are red, the traffic
signal facing the fire truck will then turn green, along with the left turn
arrow (if one exists), and the brilliant white flood lamp will begin to flash.
Once the fire truck has passed through the
intersection, optical communication with the preemption detector (on the
traffic signal) is lost. At that time the traffic signal will default back to
normal operation. Conversely, until the fire truck passes through the
intersection, it will have a green light, regardless of the time duration.
If several intersections are within the
1,800 foot range of the fire truckÕs preemption transmitter, they will all
respond accordingly to the above operational description.
Reference: Beeco Sales and Distribution, Inc. http://www.themirt.com/overview.html
Location: Road Overlays (Recurring)
Priority (Place
an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background
In the past, very little attention was given to developing a systematic approach to identifying roads to be overlaid. Such an approach is difficult to manage and some roads will have a tendency to be overlaid more often, while some are not overlaid at all.
Project Objectives
Systematically complete pavement overlays based upon the priority established by the Pavement Management System Software.
Existing Condition
The City does not have a proactive approach to maintaining the streets. This results in some roads being neglected (of which there are several), and others being maintained and improved more often than needed.
Fiscal Implications
This is a recurring maintenance service; therefore, the city should maintain a regular budget for performing pavement overlays. The cost may vary from year to year as the number roads needed maintenance varies.
Project
Costs:
|
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five Year Funding---------- |
||||
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
$1,450,000 |
|
$300,000 |
$300,000 |
$300,000 |
$300,000 |
$250,000 |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
$300,000 |
$300,000 |
$300,000 |
$300,000 |
$250,000 |
Phasing:
|
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project Justification
Regular maintenance of the streets will prolong the life of the streets. The cost of rebuilding roads is greater than maintaining them.
Comments
None
Location: Downtown Rio Vista - N. Front Street between Main and Hwy 12; First ½ block off Main Street (north and south) of Front Street, Second Street, Third Street, Fourth Street and possibly others
Priority (Place
an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background
In 2002, Main Street was reconstructed and new landscaping, street lighting and amenities were added. Due to funding limits, only the first 4 ½ blocks of Main Street were completed. The previous plans for the waterfront have also anticipated a similar streetscape project for Front Street as part of the waterfront revitalization. Many downtowns have installed streetscape improvements to create a theme on all the commercial building streets throughout downtown. In our case, these mostly extend to the alley ½ a block off Main Street, with residential beyond the alley. The commercial buildings on Second Street extend to Logan Street on the north and California Street on the south; S. Front, Third and Fourth Streets are commercial only to the first alley at mid-block.
Project Objectives
The objective of this project is to have a consistent streetscape on downtown commercial streets (streets with commercial building frontage.)
Existing Condition
No consistent landscaping or decorative street lights on any street other than the first 4 ½ blocks of Main Street
Fiscal Implications
The landscaping and lighting will need to be maintained and operated (i.e. water, power costs). Some additional drainage maintenance may be needed in some areas. PG&E will require decorative lights to be operated and maintained by the City. Capital costs will come from transportation and other grant funding (TDA, TEA21, etc.), possible trails and parks funding (Prop 40, etc.), Redevelopment funds, possible Light and Landscaping District, or Downtown Improvement District. The capital cost was estimated at approximately $250,000 per full block plus 10% design, or $2.8 million for a total of 10 blocks.
Project
Costs:
|
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five Year Funding---------- |
||||
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
$2,000,000 |
$50,000 |
$250,000 |
$1,000,000 |
$750,000 |
$750,000 |
|
TOTAL |
|
$2,000,000 |
$50,000 |
$250,000 |
$1,000,000 |
$750,000 |
$750,000 |
Phasing:
|
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
N/A |
Planning/ Programming -part of Waterfront Specific Plan |
Design/ Engineering |
Construction Front St/ Waterfront 4 blocks |
Construction 3 blocks |
Construction 3 blocks |
Project Justification
á Business climate enhancement
á Preservation of downtown as central business district
á Traffic calming, reduce auto trips, lower air pollution
á Improve pedestrian and visitor access to downtown commercial district and the waterfront.
Comments
The funding is tentative. The waterfront portion may be the only realistic part of the project for this CIP horizon.
Location: Citywide
Priority (Place
an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background:
It is recognized that consistent signage is necessary in the City.
Project Objectives:
Enhance public safety and convenience, and emphasize City identity.
Existing Condition:
There is no consistency on street signage, and they are hard to read at night. This becomes a public safety matter when police and/or fire department in an emergency situation cannot locate a response scene. Some posts need to be relocated with an 18Ó setback due to wide vehicle damage.
Fiscal Implications:
The City has received a federal appropriation to fund this project.
Project
Costs:
|
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five Year Funding---------- |
||||
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
$50,000 |
$50,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
|
TOTAL |
|
$50,000 |
$50,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
|
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
|
Design Install |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project
Justification
Enhance public safety and convenience, and emphasize City identity.
Comments
None
Location: Citywide
Priority (Place an X to indicate priority. 1 is
highest, 5 is lowest)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background
Due to lack of manpower and equipment, City roads were not completely striped.
Project Objectives
The objective is to stripe clear and visible markings for cars and pedestrians.
Existing Condition
Markings are barely visible in some areas and reflective coating is gone due to wear and tear from vehicles.
Fiscal
Implications
This is a budgeted item.
Project
Costs:
|
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five Year Funding---------- |
||||
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
$90,000 |
$30,000 |
$15,000 |
$15,000 |
$15,000 |
$15,000 |
|
TOTAL |
|
$90,000 |
$30,000 |
$15,000 |
$15,000 |
$15,000 |
$15,000 |
Phasing:
|
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
N/A |
on going |
on going |
on going |
on going |
on going |
Project
Justification
The City must provide safe delineation of streets.
Comments
None
Location: 789 Saint Francis
Priority (Place
an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background
Currently, the City has two buses to serve the citizens of Rio Vista. The City currently uses these buses for delta routes as well as routes within the City. The City will be starting a new City loop route in the near future.
Project Objectives
The objective is to better serve the transportation needs of the citizens of Rio Vista by purchasing buses that do not have a high maintenance need.
Existing Condition
One of these buses has a reached its useful life and the other
will need to be replaced in two years.
Fiscal Implications
TDA Transit Capital Funds can be used to fund the purchase of the buses. General fund monies may be needed as well if there are not sufficient TDA funds.
Project
Costs:
|
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five Year Funding---------- |
||||
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
$120,000 |
--- |
$60,000 |
--- |
$60,000 |
--- |
|
TOTAL |
|
$120,000 |
--- |
$60,000 |
--- |
$60,000 |
--- |
Phasing:
|
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project
Justification
The City needs to provide transportation services to citizens that are not able to drive.
Comments
None
Location: Citywide
Priority (Place
an X to indicate priority. 1 is highest, 5 is lowest)
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Project Background:
The City has poor signage making it difficult to find your way around. It is also unwelcoming to visitors and/or new residents. For example: Currently, Main Street has no ÒNOT A THOROUGH STREETÓ sign. With no sign in place, semi trucks come to the end of the road needing to turn around. There are no weight capacity limits posted either.
Project Objectives:
Enhance public safety and convenience.
Existing Condition:
The City lacks way-finding signs. Residents have a tough time locating the Post Office, Police Department, Coast Guard, County Park, Swimming Pool, etc.
Fiscal Implications:
The City may be eligible to receive grant funds or a federal appropriation to fund the cost of these signs. If no such funding becomes available, the transportation improvement fund will be the source of funding.
Project
Costs:
|
|
Budget through 6/2010 |
Estimated Total Project Cost |
----------Five Year Funding---------- |
||||
|
1/1/05 – 6/30/10 |
2005 / 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
||
|
|
|
$50,000 |
--- |
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
--- |
--- |
|
TOTAL |
|
$50,000 |
--- |
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
--- |
--- |
Phasing:
|
To Date |
2005/ 06 |
2006 / 07 |
2007 / 08 |
2008 / 09 |
2009 / 10 |
|
|
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Project Justification:
The City lacks way-finding signs. New residents and visitors have a tough time locating the Post Office, Police Department, Coast Guard, County Park, Swimming Pool, etc.
Comments:
Guide signs are very helpful. They tell you where you are, what road you are on and how to get where you want to go.
